• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估正反馈和负反馈的效果和偏好。

Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, California State University, Sacramento.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Jun;55(3):727-745. doi: 10.1002/jaba.911. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1002/jaba.911
PMID:35297040
Abstract

Feedback is an effective strategy for improving performance and consists of multiple characteristics. One characteristic that can influence feedback efficacy is its nature (whether feedback is positive or corrective) and little is known about the conditions under which individuals may prefer corrective over positive feedback. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback during the acquisition of novel tasks. In the first phase, participants received either positive, corrective, or no feedback across three novel tasks. Participants only mastered the task in which they received corrective feedback. In the second phase, participants chose to receive either positive or corrective feedback after completing trials of the previous phase's control task. All participants chose to receive corrective feedback more frequently than positive feedback. We discuss the implications of the results for feedback delivery in the workplace and provide suggestions for future research.

摘要

反馈是提高绩效的有效策略,它包含多个特征。其中一个特征是反馈的性质(是正面的还是纠正性的),而对于个体在什么条件下可能更喜欢纠正性反馈而不是正面反馈,我们知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是评估在学习新任务时,正面反馈和纠正性反馈的效果和偏好。在第一阶段,参与者在三个新任务中分别接受了正面、纠正或无反馈。只有接受纠正反馈的参与者才掌握了任务。在第二阶段,参与者在完成前一阶段控制任务的试次后,选择接受正面或纠正反馈。所有参与者都选择更频繁地接受纠正反馈而不是正面反馈。我们讨论了这些结果对工作场所反馈提供的意义,并为未来的研究提供了建议。

相似文献

1
Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback.评估正反馈和负反馈的效果和偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Jun;55(3):727-745. doi: 10.1002/jaba.911. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
A further investigation regarding the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback.关于正向和纠正反馈的效果和偏好的进一步调查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024;57(4):1070-1081. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1096. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Feedback-related brain activity predicts learning from feedback in multiple-choice testing.反馈相关的大脑活动可预测多项选择题测试中的反馈学习。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;12(2):323-36. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0087-9.
4
Beyond hypercorrection: remembering corrective feedback for low-confidence errors.超越过度纠正:记住对低置信度错误的纠正反馈。
Memory. 2018 Feb;26(2):201-218. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1344249. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
5
Does the feedback from previous trials influence current decisions? A study on the role of feedback processing in making decisions under explicit risk conditions.先前试验的反馈会影响当前的决策吗?一项关于在明确风险条件下进行决策时反馈处理作用的研究。
J Neuropsychol. 2008 Sep;2(2):431-43. doi: 10.1348/174866407x220607.
6
Does delayed corrective feedback enhance acquisition of correct information?延迟的纠正性反馈是否能增强正确信息的习得?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Nov;181:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
7
The Effect of Corrective Feedback in Basic Cognitive Tasks: A Study in Early Childhood.基本认知任务中纠正性反馈的效果:一项幼儿期研究
Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 23;9(2):145. doi: 10.3390/children9020145.
8
Tonic and phasic activation and arousal effects as a function of feedback in repetitive-choice reaction time tasks.
Behav Neurosci. 2002 Jun;116(3):397-402. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.116.3.397.
9
Probabilistic classification learning with corrective feedback is selectively impaired in early Huntington's disease--evidence for the role of the striatum in learning with feedback.纠错反馈的概率分类学习在早期亨廷顿病中受到选择性损害——纹状体在反馈学习中的作用的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(9):2176-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
What would you do? The effect of verbal persuasion on task choice.你会怎么做?言语劝说对任务选择的影响。
Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):583-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Unsolicited Negative Feedback in Academic Settings.学术环境中主动提供的负面反馈的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 17;15(8):e43640. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43640. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Practical and customizable study strategies for clerkship year success.实习年成功的实用且可定制的学习策略。
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Sep 8;14(4):112-115. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75072. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
A Component Analysis of Skill Acquisition Consequences with Listener Responses.基于听众反应的技能习得结果的成分分析
J Behav Educ. 2023 Mar 8:1-28. doi: 10.1007/s10864-023-09509-5.