Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cancer Med. 2022 May;11(10):2096-2105. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4555. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
Oncology telemedicine was implemented rapidly after COVID-19. We examined multilevel correlates and outcomes of telemedicine use for patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for cancer.
Upon implementation of a telemedicine platform at a comprehensive cancer center, we analyzed 468 consecutive patient RT courses from March 16, 2020 to June 1, 2020. Patients were categorized as using telemedicine during ≥1 weekly oncologist visits versus in-person oncologist management only. Temporal trends were evaluated with Cochran-Armitage tests; chi-squared test and multilevel multivariable logistic models identified correlates of use and outcomes.
Overall, 33% used telemedicine versus 67% in-person only oncologist management. Temporal trends (p < 0.001) correlated with policy changes: uptake was rapid after local social-distancing restrictions, reaching peak use (35% of visits) within 4 weeks of implementation. Use declined to 15% after national "Opening Up America Again" guidelines. In the multilevel model, patients more likely to use telemedicine were White non-Hispanic versus Black or Hispanic (odds ratio [OR] = 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-4.72; p = 0.04) or receiving ≥6 fractions of RT versus 1-5 fractions (OR = 4.49, 95% CI 2.29-8.80; p < 0.001). Model intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated 43% utilization variation was physician-level driven. Treatment toxicities and 30-day emergency visits or unplanned hospitalizations did not differ for patients using versus not using telemedicine (p > 0.05, all comparisons).
Though toxicities were similar with telemedicine oncology management, there remained lower uptake among non-White patients. Continuing strategies for oncology telemedicine implementation should address multilevel patient, physician, and policy factors to optimize telemedicine's potential to surmount-and not exacerbate-barriers to quality cancer care.
在 COVID-19 之后,肿瘤学远程医疗迅速实施。我们研究了癌症患者接受放射治疗 (RT) 过程中使用远程医疗的多层次相关因素和结果。
在综合癌症中心实施远程医疗平台后,我们分析了 2020 年 3 月 16 日至 6 月 1 日期间的 468 例连续患者 RT 课程。患者分为每周至少有 1 次接受远程医疗的肿瘤学家就诊和仅接受现场管理的肿瘤学家就诊。使用 Cochran-Armitage 检验评估时间趋势;卡方检验和多层次多变量逻辑模型确定使用和结果的相关性。
总体而言,有 33%的患者使用了远程医疗,而仅 67%的患者接受了现场管理的肿瘤学家管理。时间趋势(p<0.001)与政策变化相关:在当地社会隔离限制后,使用率迅速上升,实施后 4 周内达到高峰(35%的就诊)。在全国“重新开放美国”指南发布后,使用率下降至 15%。在多层次模型中,与白人非西班牙裔相比,更有可能使用远程医疗的患者为黑人或西班牙裔(优势比 [OR] = 2.20,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.03-4.72;p=0.04)或接受≥6 次 RT 剂量与 1-5 次剂量(OR=4.49,95%CI 2.29-8.80;p<0.001)。模型组内相关系数表明,43%的利用率变化是由医生水平驱动的。接受与不接受远程医疗的患者之间的治疗毒性以及 30 天内急诊就诊或计划外住院的发生率没有差异(p>0.05,所有比较)。
尽管远程医疗肿瘤学管理的毒性相似,但非白人患者的使用率仍然较低。继续实施肿瘤学远程医疗的策略应解决多层次的患者、医生和政策因素,以优化远程医疗的潜力,克服而非加剧癌症护理质量的障碍。