Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg - Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033, Strasbourg, France.
Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
Breast. 2022 Jun;63:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1), as well as lapatinib plus capecitabine were proven effective in two Phase III studies, following first-line trastuzumab plus a taxane. The introduction of dual HER2 blockade by trastuzumab and pertuzumab as first-line has positioned T-DM1 into second-line, and lapatinib plus capecitabine beyond, without formal evaluation of these strategies.
ESME Data Platform (NCT03275311) included individual data from all patients aged ≥18 years, in whom first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was initiated between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016 in one of the 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers. The efficacy of T-DM1 and lapatinib plus capecitabine combination, following double blockade associating trastuzumab and pertuzumab were evaluated in this national real-life database. Eligibility criteria were: female, MBC, HER2+ tumor, first-line taxane-based chemotherapy and dual HER2-blockage by trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. Cohort A received second-line T-DM1, and Cohort B second-line T-DM1 and third or fourth-line lapatinib plus capecitabine.
Cohort A comprised 233 patients, and Cohort B 47 patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months in Cohort A and 4.6 months in Cohort B. Median overall survival were 36.7 months and 12.9 months, respectively. PFS was significantly dependent on the preceding treatment line's duration. In cohort A, HER2 expression status was a significant predictive factor of PFS.
First-line trastuzumab plus pertuzumab do not markedly diminish T-DM1's efficacy in second-line. Similarly, sequential treatment with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab then T-DM1 does not noticeably modify the efficacy of lapatinib plus capecitabine.
曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物(T-DM1)以及拉帕替尼加卡培他滨在曲妥珠单抗加紫杉烷一线治疗后两项 III 期研究中被证明是有效的。曲妥珠单抗和帕妥珠单抗的双重 HER2 阻断作为一线治疗将 T-DM1 定位为二线治疗,而拉帕替尼加卡培他滨则定位为三线或四线治疗,而没有对这些策略进行正式评估。
ESME 数据平台(NCT03275311)纳入了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间在法国 18 个综合癌症中心之一接受转移性乳腺癌(MBC)一线治疗的所有年龄≥18 岁的患者的个体数据。在这个全国性的真实世界数据库中,评估了在曲妥珠单抗和帕妥珠单抗双重阻断后接受 T-DM1 和拉帕替尼加卡培他滨联合治疗的疗效。入选标准为:女性,MBC,HER2+肿瘤,一线基于紫杉烷的化疗和曲妥珠单抗加帕妥珠单抗的双重 HER2 阻断。队列 A 接受二线 T-DM1 治疗,队列 B 接受二线 T-DM1 和三线或四线拉帕替尼加卡培他滨治疗。
队列 A 包括 233 例患者,队列 B 包括 47 例患者。队列 A 的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 7.1 个月,队列 B 为 4.6 个月。中位总生存期分别为 36.7 个月和 12.9 个月。PFS 显著依赖于先前治疗线的持续时间。在队列 A 中,HER2 表达状态是 PFS 的显著预测因素。
一线曲妥珠单抗加帕妥珠单抗并未显著降低二线 T-DM1 的疗效。同样,曲妥珠单抗加帕妥珠单抗序贯治疗后再使用 T-DM1 也不会明显改变拉帕替尼加卡培他滨的疗效。