Schreven Sander, Smeets Jeroen B J, Beek Peter J
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
InnoSportLab De Tongelreep, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 1;4:758095. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.758095. eCollection 2022.
To date, optimal propulsion in swimming has been studied predominantly using physical or computational models of the arm and seldom during real-life swimming. In the present study we examined the contributions of selected power, technique and anthropometric measures on sprint performance during arms-only front crawl swimming. To this end, 25 male adult competitive swimmers, equipped with markers on their arms and hands, performed four 25-m sprint trials, which were recorded on video. For the fastest trial of each swimmer, we determined the average swim speed as well as two technique variables: the average stroke width and average horizontal acceleration. Each participant also swam 10-12 trials over a custom-made system for measuring active drag, the MAD system. Since the propelling efficiency is 100% while swimming over the MAD system, the power output of the swimmer is fully used to overcome the drag acting on the body. The resulting speed thus represents the ratio between power output and drag. We included this power-to-drag ratio, the power output and the drag coefficient of the fastest trial on the MAD system in the analysis. Finally, the body height and hand surface area of each swimmer were determined as anthropometric variables. A model selection procedure was conducted to predict the swim speed from the two technique variables, three power variables and the two anthropometric variables. The ratio between power output and the drag was the only significant predictor of the maximal swimming speed ( = 0.86·). The variations in this ratio explained 65% of the variance in swimming performance. This indicates that sprint performance in arms-only front crawl swimming is strongly associated with the power-to-drag ratio and not with the isolated power variables and the anthropometric and technique variables selected in the present study.
迄今为止,对于游泳中最佳推进力的研究主要是使用手臂的物理模型或计算模型,而在实际游泳过程中的研究很少。在本研究中,我们考察了特定功率、技术和人体测量指标对仅使用手臂的自由泳短距离冲刺成绩的影响。为此,25名成年男性竞技游泳运动员在其手臂和手上佩戴标记物,进行了4次25米的冲刺试验,并进行了视频记录。对于每位游泳运动员的最快一次试验,我们测定了平均游泳速度以及两个技术变量:平均划水宽度和平均水平加速度。每位参与者还在一个定制的主动阻力测量系统(MAD系统)上进行了10 - 12次试验。由于在MAD系统上游泳时推进效率为100%,游泳运动员的功率输出完全用于克服作用在身体上的阻力。由此产生的速度代表了功率输出与阻力之间的比值。我们将这个功率与阻力的比值、功率输出以及在MAD系统上最快一次试验的阻力系数纳入分析。最后,测定了每位游泳运动员的身高和手部表面积作为人体测量变量。我们进行了模型选择程序,以从两个技术变量、三个功率变量和两个人体测量变量来预测游泳速度。功率输出与阻力的比值是最大游泳速度的唯一显著预测因子( = 0.86·)。该比值的变化解释了游泳成绩中65%的方差。这表明仅使用手臂的自由泳短距离冲刺成绩与功率与阻力的比值密切相关,而与本研究中所选择的孤立功率变量、人体测量和技术变量无关。