• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞芬太尼在小儿患者中使用两种不同剂量氯胺酮且不使用神经肌肉阻滞剂时的可接受插管条件需求。

Remifentanil requirement for acceptable intubation conditions with two different doses of ketamine without a neuromuscular blocking agent in pediatric patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Mar;26(5):1632-1639. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202203_28231.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202203_28231
PMID:35302210
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The optimal remifentanil concentration for improving intubation conditions when intubation is performed without neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) but with ketamine as an induction agent remains unknown. Here, we aimed to identify the effective bolus doses of remifentanil required to achieve acceptable intubation conditions upon anesthesia induction with 1 or 2 mg/kg ketamine without NMBAs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized up-down sequential allocation study, we enrolled pediatric patients aged 3-12 years undergoing general anesthesia for inguinal hernia surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive either ketamine 1.0 mg/kg (K1 group) or 2.0 mg/kg (K2 group) intravenously until seven success-failure pairs were achieved. The remifentanil dose for each patient was determined using the modified Dixon's up-and-down method with an initial dose of 2.5 μg/kg and a step size of 0.5 μg/kg.

RESULTS

In total, 51 patients (22 in the K1 group and 29 in the K2 group) were enrolled. The effective dose (ED)50s of remifentanil for obtaining clinically acceptable intubation conditions under anesthesia induction with ketamine but without NMBAs was 3.2 μg/kg in the K1 group and 1.6 μg/kg in the K2 group. High-dose remifentanil with 1 mg/kg ketamine was associated with more severe chest wall rigidity and lower mean blood pressure and heart rate than was low-dose remifentanil with 2 mg/kg ketamine.

CONCLUSIONS

The ED50 of remifentanil required for clinically acceptable intubation conditions with anesthesia induction using 1 mg/kg ketamine without NMBAs in pediatric patients was twice that when using 2 mg/kg ketamine. The combination of 2 mg/kg ketamine and remifentanil was better at preventing chest wall rigidity.

摘要

目的

在无神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBAs)但使用氯胺酮作为诱导剂进行插管时,改善插管条件的瑞芬太尼最佳浓度尚不清楚。在此,我们旨在确定在无 NMBA 情况下使用 1 或 2 mg/kg 氯胺酮诱导麻醉时,达到可接受插管条件所需的瑞芬太尼有效推注剂量。

患者和方法

在这项前瞻性、双盲、随机、上下序贯分配研究中,我们纳入了接受全身麻醉行腹股沟疝手术的 3-12 岁小儿患者。患者被随机分配至两组中的一组,分别接受静脉注射 1.0 mg/kg(K1 组)或 2.0 mg/kg(K2 组)氯胺酮,直至达到 7 个成功-失败配对。每位患者的瑞芬太尼剂量使用改良 Dixon 上下法确定,初始剂量为 2.5 μg/kg,步长为 0.5 μg/kg。

结果

共纳入 51 例患者(K1 组 22 例,K2 组 29 例)。在无 NMBA 情况下使用氯胺酮诱导麻醉时,获得可接受插管条件的瑞芬太尼有效剂量(ED)50 在 K1 组为 3.2 μg/kg,在 K2 组为 1.6 μg/kg。与低剂量瑞芬太尼(2 mg/kg 氯胺酮)相比,高剂量瑞芬太尼(1 mg/kg 氯胺酮)与更严重的胸壁僵硬以及更低的平均血压和心率相关。

结论

在无 NMBA 情况下使用 1 mg/kg 氯胺酮诱导麻醉时,儿童患者获得可接受插管条件所需的瑞芬太尼 ED50 是使用 2 mg/kg 氯胺酮时的两倍。2 mg/kg 氯胺酮与瑞芬太尼联合使用可更好地预防胸壁僵硬。

相似文献

1
Remifentanil requirement for acceptable intubation conditions with two different doses of ketamine without a neuromuscular blocking agent in pediatric patients.瑞芬太尼在小儿患者中使用两种不同剂量氯胺酮且不使用神经肌肉阻滞剂时的可接受插管条件需求。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Mar;26(5):1632-1639. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202203_28231.
2
The optimal dose of remifentanil for acceptable intubating conditions during propofol induction without neuromuscular blockade.瑞芬太尼用于丙泊酚诱导无神经肌肉阻滞时可接受插管条件的最佳剂量。
J Clin Anesth. 2012 Aug;24(5):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.11.006.
3
Effect of esketamine on the EC50 of remifentanil for blunting cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation in female patients under general anesthesia: a sequential allocation dose-finding study.依托咪酯对全麻女性患者气管插管心血管反应的 EC50 产生影响:序贯分配剂量探索研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02454-4.
4
Effect of different doses of ketamine with low-dose rocuronium on intubation conditions in children: prospective randomized double blind trial.不同剂量氯胺酮复合小剂量罗库溴铵对小儿插管条件的影响:前瞻性随机双盲试验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Feb;23(4):1807-1815. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201902_17144.
5
Optimal remifentanil dosage for intubation without muscle relaxants in elderly patients.老年患者无肌松药插管时瑞芬太尼的最佳剂量。
Drugs Aging. 2012 Nov;29(11):905-9. doi: 10.1007/s40266-012-0019-y.
6
Dose of rocuronium for rapid tracheal intubation following remifentanil 2 μg kg-1 and propofol 2 mg kg-1.瑞芬太尼 2μg/kg 和丙泊酚 2mg/kg 后罗库溴铵用于快速气管插管的剂量。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Sep;30(9):550-5. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283622ba0.
7
Effective dose of remimazolam co-administered with remifentanil to facilitate I-gel insertion without neuromuscular blocking agents: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial.瑞马唑仑复合瑞芬太尼用于无肌松药下引导气管插管的半数有效剂量:上下序贯法分配试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Mar 16;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02041-z.
8
The optimal exhaled concentration of sevoflurane for intubation without neuromuscular blockade using clinical bolus doses of remifentanil: A randomized controlled trial.使用临床推注剂量瑞芬太尼在无神经肌肉阻滞情况下进行气管插管时七氟醚的最佳呼出浓度:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(9):e6235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006235.
9
Comparison of the effects of remifentanil and remifentanil plus lidocaine on intubation conditions in intellectually disabled patients.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;64(4):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
10
Median effective dose of remifentanil for awake laryngoscopy and intubation.瑞芬太尼用于清醒喉镜检查和插管的半数有效剂量。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Jul 5;122(13):1507-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective doses of remimazolam and esketamine combined with remifentanil for endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxants in pediatric patients.瑞米唑仑与艾司氯胺酮联合瑞芬太尼用于小儿患者无肌松剂气管插管的有效剂量。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 18;16:1558966. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1558966. eCollection 2025.