The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey.
University of Bamberg.
J Psychol. 2022;156(4):310-329. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2022.2048777. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
Although a great deal of research has shown the positive effects of mindfulness on mental health, some studies have provided evidence that mindfulness can have negative consequences. However, not much is known about the conditions that can account for such negative effects. We examined the moderating roles of difficulties in emotion regulation and basic psychological need frustration in the relationship between mindfulness and psychological ill-being. Longitudinal data were collected at three points in time during a 6-month period from two adult samples in Turkey and Germany. Self-report measures were used to measure ill-being, mindfulness, emotion regulation difficulties, and need frustration. In the German sample, difficulties in emotion regulation and need frustration were related to ill-being, but there were no significant interactions. In the Turkish sample, need frustration predicted ill-being, and the interaction between mindfulness and difficulties in emotion regulation also predicted ill-being. Mindfulness was a protective factor among people with no major difficulties in emotion regulation, whereas it was a risk factor among those with emotion regulation difficulties. The findings suggest that the relationship between mindfulness and ill-being may be more complex than previously thought.
虽然大量研究表明正念对心理健康有积极影响,但也有一些研究提供了证据表明正念可能会产生负面影响。然而,对于哪些情况可能导致这种负面影响,我们知之甚少。我们研究了情绪调节困难和基本心理需求受挫在正念与心理不适之间关系中的调节作用。在土耳其和德国的两个成人样本中,在 6 个月的时间内分三个时间点收集了纵向数据。使用自我报告的测量方法来测量不适、正念、情绪调节困难和需求受挫。在德国样本中,情绪调节困难和需求受挫与不适有关,但没有显著的交互作用。在土耳其样本中,需求受挫预测了不适,而正念和情绪调节困难之间的交互作用也预测了不适。对于那些情绪调节困难不大的人来说,正念是一种保护因素,而对于那些情绪调节困难的人来说,正念则是一种风险因素。这些发现表明,正念与不适之间的关系可能比之前想象的更为复杂。