He Junshen, Chen Zhao, Wen Ting, Xu Liqun, Chen Chunlin, Liu Ping
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Placenta. 2022 Apr;121:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
Ultrasound-diagnosed small for gestational age (SGA) has a particular rate of misdiagnosis. We hypothesized that diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), specifically intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging, could identify false-positive SGA (fpSGA).
A prospective study. Placentas were scanned at gestational weeks 28-41 on a 3.0 T MRI using 9 b-values (0-800 s/mm). Pregnancies were suspected as complicated by SGA when fortnightly ultrasound biometries confirmed that estimated fetal weights (EFW) were <10th percentile, while final birth weight >10th percentile was considered fpSGA. A total of 28 control, 20 fpSGA and 27 SGA patients were included. The mean values of the diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated and compared between groups.
In the control and fpSGA groups, D (control, 1866.61 ± 213.74 μm/s; fpSGA, 1807.37 ± 199.89 μm/s), D* (control, 54833.29 ±s 8174.20 μm/s; fpSGA, 52689.20 ± 9420.63 μm/s) and f (control, 33.31% ± 3.49%; fpSGA, 33.17% ± 2.96%) were similar. However, all three were significantly lower in the SGA group (D, 1664.32 ± 288.53 μm/s; D*, 48279.82 ± 7497.36 μm/s; f, 27.53% ± 3.52%) than in the other two groups (p < 0.05). The f was the best parameter in distinguishing the control and SGA groups, and the fpSGA and SGA groups.
IVIM analysis might be suitable for the noninvasive identification of fpSGA pregnancies and SGA patients as an important supplement to ultrasound biometry.
超声诊断的小于胎龄儿(SGA)存在一定的误诊率。我们推测,扩散加权磁共振成像(MRI),特别是体素内不相干运动(IVIM)成像,能够识别假阳性SGA(fpSGA)。
一项前瞻性研究。在孕28 - 41周时,使用9个b值(0 - 800 s/mm)在3.0 T MRI上对胎盘进行扫描。当每两周一次的超声生物测量证实估计胎儿体重(EFW)低于第10百分位数时,怀疑妊娠合并SGA,而最终出生体重>第10百分位数则被视为fpSGA。共纳入28例对照组、20例fpSGA患者和27例SGA患者。计算并比较各组间扩散系数(D)、伪扩散系数(D*)和灌注分数(f)的平均值。
在对照组和fpSGA组中,D(对照组,1866.61±213.74μm/s;fpSGA组,1807.37±199.89μm/s)、D*(对照组,54833.29±8174.20μm/s;fpSGA组,52689.20±9420.63μm/s)和f(对照组,33.31%±3.49%;fpSGA组,33.17%±2.96%)相似。然而,SGA组的这三项指标均显著低于其他两组(D,1664.32±288.53μm/s;D*,48279.82±7497.36μm/s;f,27.53%±3.52%)(p < 0.05)。f是区分对照组与SGA组以及fpSGA组与SGA组的最佳参数。
IVIM分析可能适合于对fpSGA妊娠和SGA患者进行无创识别,作为超声生物测量的重要补充。