• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于德国一项大型登记研究数据的重组人促卵泡生成素α(r-hFSH)与尿源性高纯度绝经期促性腺激素(hMG)的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness analysis of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa(r-hFSH) and urinary highly purified menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) based on data from a large German registry.

作者信息

Bühler Klaus, Roeder Claudia, Schwarze Juan-Enrique, Lispi Monica, Allignol Arthur, Falla Edel, Lukyanov Vasily, D Hooghe Thomas, Fischer Robert

机构信息

Scientific Clinical Centre for Endometriosis, University Hospitals of Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany; Department of Gynaecology, Jena-University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Pharma Value Consulting, Oberwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Dec;85(Pt B):188-202. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.02.002
PMID:35304097
Abstract

This was a retrospective real-world evidence analysis of the costs per live birth for reference recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG-HP), based on data from a German in vitro fertilization registry (RecDate). Pregnancy and live birth rates from the RecDate real-world evidence study over three complete assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles using the same gonadotropin drug were used as clinical inputs. Costs related to ART treatment and to drugs were obtained from public sources. Treatment with r-hFSH-alfa resulted in higher adjusted cumulative live birth rates versus hMG-HP after one (25.3% vs. 22.3%), two (30.9% vs. 27.5%), and three (31.9% vs. 28.6%) ART cycles. Costs per live birth were lower with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG-HP after one (€17,938 vs. €20,054), two (€18,251 vs. €20,437), and three (€18,473 vs. €20,680) ART cycles. r-hFSH-alfa was found to be a cost-effective strategy compared with hMG-HP over three cycles.

摘要

这是一项基于德国体外受精登记处(RecDate)数据的回顾性真实世界证据分析,比较了重组人促卵泡激素α(r-hFSH-alfa)与高纯度尿促性素(hMG-HP)每例活产的成本。RecDate真实世界证据研究中,使用相同促性腺激素药物进行三个完整辅助生殖技术(ART)周期的妊娠率和活产率被用作临床输入数据。ART治疗和药物相关成本来自公共来源。在进行一个(25.3%对22.3%)、两个(30.9%对27.5%)和三个(31.9%对28.6%)ART周期后,与hMG-HP相比,r-hFSH-alfa导致更高的调整后累积活产率。在进行一个(17,938欧元对20,054欧元)、两个(18,251欧元对20,437欧元)和三个(18,473欧元对20,680欧元)ART周期后,r-hFSH-alfa每例活产的成本低于hMG-HP。研究发现,在三个周期内,与hMG-HP相比,r-hFSH-alfa是一种具有成本效益的策略。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa(r-hFSH) and urinary highly purified menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) based on data from a large German registry.基于德国一项大型登记研究数据的重组人促卵泡生成素α(r-hFSH)与尿源性高纯度绝经期促性腺激素(hMG)的成本效益分析
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Dec;85(Pt B):188-202. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
2
Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.重组人卵泡刺激素阿尔法(r-hFSH-alfa)与高纯度尿促性腺激素(hMG HP)在辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗中的比较效果:德国的一项非干预性研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Jun 16;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00768-3.
3
Economic Evaluation of Three Frequently Used Gonadotrophins in Assisted Reproduction Techniques in the Management of Infertility in the Netherlands.荷兰辅助生殖技术中三种常用促性腺激素治疗不孕症的经济学评估
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Dec;14(6):719-727. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0259-9.
4
A direct healthcare cost analysis of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中,控制性卵巢超促排卵时,重组 LH 与 hMG 对 FSH 补充的直接医疗成本分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Feb;309(2):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07309-w. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
5
Corifollitropin alfa compared to daily rFSH or HP-HMG in GnRH antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol for patients undergoing assisted reproduction.在接受辅助生殖的患者的促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂控制性卵巢刺激方案中,将注射用重组人促卵泡激素α与每日注射重组促卵泡素或高纯度尿促性素进行比较。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017 Jun 1;21(2):67-69. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170017.
6
A comparison of menotropin, highly-purified menotropin and follitropin alfa in cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.比较人绝经期促性腺激素、高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素和卵泡刺激素阿尔法在卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中的应用。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009 Oct 14;7:111. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-111.
7
A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.回顾性、匹配病例对照研究:在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中控制性卵巢超刺激时,重组 LH 与 hMG 对 FSH 的补充作用。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 15;13:931756. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.931756. eCollection 2022.
8
The cumulative live birth rate of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alfa verse urinary human follicle-stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles.重组促卵泡激素阿尔法与尿源性人促卵泡激素在辅助生殖技术周期中卵巢刺激的累积活产率。
J Ovarian Res. 2022 Jun 21;15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13048-022-01009-w.
9
Comparative effectiveness of gonadotropins used for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in France: A real-world observational study from the French nationwide claims database (SNDS).法国辅助生殖技术(ART)中促性腺激素用于卵巢刺激的疗效比较:来自法国全国索赔数据库(SNDS)的真实世界观察性研究。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jun;88:102308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.102308. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
10
A double-blind, randomized study to compare recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal-F) with highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin) HP) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The French Multicentre Trialists.一项双盲、随机研究,在接受包括卵胞浆内单精子注射在内的辅助生殖技术的女性中,比较重组人促卵泡激素(FSH;果纳芬)与高度纯化的尿促卵泡素(高纯度美诺孕)。法国多中心试验者。
Hum Reprod. 2000 Mar;15(3):520-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.520.

引用本文的文献

1
A direct healthcare cost analysis of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.在 GnRH 拮抗剂方案中,控制性卵巢超促排卵时,重组 LH 与 hMG 对 FSH 补充的直接医疗成本分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Feb;309(2):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07309-w. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
2
Valuing infertility treatment: Why QALYs are inadequate, and an alternative approach to cost-effectiveness thresholds.重视不孕治疗:为何质量调整生命年(QALYs)并不充分,以及成本效益阈值的替代方法。
Front Med Technol. 2022 Dec 23;4:1053719. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.1053719. eCollection 2022.