• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显微镜下阳性(R1)切缘亚组对 III 期结直肠癌复发模式的影响——一项回顾性队列研究。

The impact of subdivisions of microscopically positive (R1) margins on patterns of relapse in stage III colorectal cancer - A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Pathology, Rigshospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jul;24(7):828-837. doi: 10.1111/codi.16121. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1111/codi.16121
PMID:35304974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10286659/
Abstract

AIM

Microscopically positive (R1) margins are associated with poorer outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. However, the impact of subdivisions of R1 margins, be they to the primary tumour (R1 tumour) or to lymph node metastases (R1LNM), on patterns of relapse is unknown.

METHODS

Patients treated for stage III colorectal cancer from 01 January 2016 to 31 December 2019 in four specialist centres were identified from the Danish national cancer registry. Patients were stratified into three groups according to margin status (R0 vs. R1 tumour vs. R1LNM). The primary outcomes were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

A total of 1,164 patients were included, with R1 margins found in 237 (20.4%). Irrespective of tumour location, R1 tumour and R1LNM margins were independent prognostic factors for systemic relapse (R1 tumour HR 1.84, CI: 1.17-2.88, p = 0.008; R1LNM HR 1.59, CI: 1.12-2.27, p = 0.009) and disease-related death (R1 tumour HR 2.08, CI: 1.12-3.85, p = 0.020; R1LNM HR 1.84, CI: 1.12-3.02, p = 0.016). Whereas R1 tumour margins were associated with poorer 3-year LRFS in both colon and rectum cancer, R1LNM margins only reduced LRFS in patients with rectal cancer. Patterns of relapse differed between R1 subdivisions, with R1 tumour margins more likely to affect multiple anatomical sites, with a predilection for extra-hepatic/pulmonary metastases.

CONCLUSION

Subdivisions of R1 margins have a distinct impact on the oncological outcomes and patterns of disease relapse in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

摘要

目的

显微镜下阳性(R1)切缘与结直肠癌患者的预后较差相关。然而,R1 切缘的细分,无论是针对原发肿瘤(R1 肿瘤)还是淋巴结转移(R1LNM),对复发模式的影响尚不清楚。

方法

从丹麦国家癌症登记处确定了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日在四个专业中心接受 III 期结直肠癌治疗的患者。根据切缘状态(R0 与 R1 肿瘤与 R1LNM)将患者分为三组。主要结局是局部无复发生存(LRFS)、远处无转移生存(DMFS)和疾病特异性生存(DSS)。

结果

共纳入 1164 例患者,其中 237 例(20.4%)存在 R1 切缘。无论肿瘤位置如何,R1 肿瘤和 R1LNM 切缘均是全身复发的独立预后因素(R1 肿瘤 HR 1.84,CI:1.17-2.88,p=0.008;R1LNM HR 1.59,CI:1.12-2.27,p=0.009)和疾病相关死亡(R1 肿瘤 HR 2.08,CI:1.12-3.85,p=0.020;R1LNM HR 1.84,CI:1.12-3.02,p=0.016)。虽然 R1 肿瘤切缘与结直肠癌和直肠癌患者的 3 年 LRFS 较差相关,但 R1LNM 切缘仅降低直肠癌患者的 LRFS。复发模式在 R1 细分之间存在差异,R1 肿瘤切缘更可能影响多个解剖部位,偏爱肝外/肺转移。

结论

R1 切缘的细分对 III 期结直肠癌患者的肿瘤学结局和疾病复发模式有明显影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7980/10286659/5f00eed17160/CODI-24-828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7980/10286659/d08bacd0fc05/CODI-24-828-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7980/10286659/03a19ebf6f29/CODI-24-828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7980/10286659/5f00eed17160/CODI-24-828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7980/10286659/d08bacd0fc05/CODI-24-828-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7980/10286659/03a19ebf6f29/CODI-24-828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7980/10286659/5f00eed17160/CODI-24-828-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of subdivisions of microscopically positive (R1) margins on patterns of relapse in stage III colorectal cancer - A retrospective cohort study.显微镜下阳性(R1)切缘亚组对 III 期结直肠癌复发模式的影响——一项回顾性队列研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jul;24(7):828-837. doi: 10.1111/codi.16121. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
The significance of subdivisions of microscopically positive (R1) margins in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study of a national cancer registry.结直肠癌显微镜下阳性(R1)切缘亚组的意义:国家癌症登记处的回顾性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Feb;24(2):197-209. doi: 10.1111/codi.15971. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Do differences in surgical quality account for the higher rate of R1 margins to lymph node metastases in right- versus left-sided Stage III colon cancer: A retrospective cohort study.手术质量的差异是否导致右侧与左侧III期结肠癌中R1切缘至淋巴结转移的发生率更高:一项回顾性队列研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr;25(4):679-687. doi: 10.1111/codi.16459. Epub 2023 Jan 8.
4
Differences in adjuvant chemotherapy and oncological outcomes according to margin status in patients with stage III colon cancer.根据 III 期结肠癌患者的切缘状态,辅助化疗和肿瘤学结局的差异。
Acta Oncol. 2023 Jun;62(6):594-600. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2218555. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
The Association of Mismatch Repair Status with Microscopically Positive (R1) Margins in Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.错配修复状态与 III 期结直肠癌显微镜下阳性(R1)切缘的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6423-6431. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15595-0. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
6
Microscopic resection margins adversely influence survival rates after surgery for colorectal liver metastases: An open ambidirectional Cohort Study.结直肠肝转移手术后显微镜下切缘状态不良会影响生存率:一项开放性双向队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
7
Recurrence at surgical margin following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is not associated with R1 resection and does not impact survival.结直肠肝转移瘤行肝切除术后手术切缘复发与 R1 切除无关,且不影响生存。
Surgery. 2021 May;169(5):1061-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.024. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
8
Impact of positive microscopic resection margins (R1) after gastrectomy in diffuse-type gastric cancer.胃弥漫型癌胃切除术后阳性显微镜切缘(R1)的影响。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;149(13):11105-11115. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04981-y. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
9
The prognostic impact of resection margin status varies according to the genetic and morphological evaluation (GAME) score for colorectal liver metastasis.结直肠肝转移的基因和形态学评估(GAME)评分可改变切缘状态的预后影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;124(4):619-626. doi: 10.1002/jso.26557. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
10
Prognostic impact of primary tumour location after curative resection in Stage I-III colorectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective study.根治性切除术后Ⅰ-Ⅲ期结直肠癌原发肿瘤部位对预后的影响:单中心回顾性研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 7;54(7):753-760. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyae035.

引用本文的文献

1
Transposition of Internal Iliac Artery to External Iliac Artery in a Case of Locally Advanced Colonic Carcinoma: A Case Report.局部进展期结肠癌病例中髂内动脉转位至髂外动脉:一例报告
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Feb 14;56(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01178-z.
2
The Association of Mismatch Repair Status with Microscopically Positive (R1) Margins in Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.错配修复状态与 III 期结直肠癌显微镜下阳性(R1)切缘的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6423-6431. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15595-0. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3
Neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer: comprehensive review.

本文引用的文献

1
The significance of subdivisions of microscopically positive (R1) margins in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study of a national cancer registry.结直肠癌显微镜下阳性(R1)切缘亚组的意义:国家癌症登记处的回顾性研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2022 Feb;24(2):197-209. doi: 10.1111/codi.15971. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
Prognostic importance of circumferential resection margin in the era of evolving surgical and multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠癌不断发展的外科和多学科治疗时代中环周切缘的预后意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2021 Aug;170(2):412-431. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
3
结直肠癌的新辅助治疗:全面综述。
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae038.
4
Survival and safety after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or upfront surgery for locally advanced colon cancer: meta-analysis.局部晚期结肠癌新辅助化疗或直接手术治疗后的生存和安全性:荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 31;111(2). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae021.
Validation of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG.dk) database - on behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group.
丹麦结直肠癌组(DCCG.dk)数据库验证-代表丹麦结直肠癌组。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Dec;22(12):2057-2067. doi: 10.1111/codi.15352. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
4
Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.局限性结肠癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1291-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
Circulating Tumor DNA Analyses as Markers of Recurrence Risk and Benefit of Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer.循环肿瘤 DNA 分析作为 III 期结肠癌辅助治疗复发风险和获益的标志物。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1710-1717. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3616.
6
The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.直肠癌环周切缘处病理阳性淋巴结的临床意义。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Feb;23(2):151-159. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01947-6. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
7
Impact of specific modes of circumferential resection margin involvement in rectal cancer local recurrence: A retrospective study.环周切缘受累的特定模式对直肠癌局部复发的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;118(7):1122-1128. doi: 10.1002/jso.25252. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer.III期结肠癌辅助化疗的疗程
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 29;378(13):1177-1188. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713709.
9
Significance of R1 resection margin in colon cancer resections in the modern era.现代结肠癌切除术中R1切缘的意义。
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;17(11):943-53. doi: 10.1111/codi.12960.
10
Oligometastatic cancer: an entity, a useful concept, or a therapeutic opportunity?寡转移癌:一种实体、一个有用的概念还是一个治疗机会?
J R Soc Med. 2012 Jun;105(6):242-6. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110279.