Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Jun;59:102554. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102554. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
No studies have evaluated whether interventions used by Brazilian physiotherapists for the treatment of patellofemoral pain (PFP) are in line with the best existing scientific evidence.
Identify the interventions most commonly used by Brazilian physiotherapists for the rehabilitation of PFP and determine whether characteristics of physiotherapists and knowledge regarding evidence-based practice (EBP) influence the choice of interventions.
Cross-sectional web-based survey.
Brazilian physiotherapists who treat patients with PFP participated in the study. Characteristics of the participants, information regarding EBP and interventions used in the treatment of PFP were collected through an online questionnaire. Descriptive analysis of the data was performed. Logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate associations between the interventions and both the characteristics of the physiotherapists and their knowledge regarding EBP.
One hundred and ninety-four physiotherapists completed the questionnaire, 97.4% of whom reported using combined hip and quadriceps strengthening exercises, whereas only 25.3% reported using foot orthoses. A significant number of physiotherapists also reported using interventions that are not recommended (such as patellar mobilization, lumbar, hip and knee mobilization/manipulation and biophysical agents). Physiotherapists with a master's or doctoral degree and those who were aware of clinical practice guidelines were respectively 2.57-fold and 3.81-fold more likely to use recommended interventions.
Most Brazilian physiotherapists choose interventions that are in line with current scientific evidence. However, a significant number also use interventions that are not recommended for the treatment of PFP.
目前尚无研究评估巴西物理治疗师用于治疗髌股关节疼痛(PFP)的干预措施是否与最佳现有科学证据相符。
确定巴西物理治疗师用于 PFP 康复最常用的干预措施,并确定物理治疗师的特征和对循证实践(EBP)的了解是否会影响干预措施的选择。
横断面网络调查。
参与研究的巴西物理治疗师治疗患有 PFP 的患者。通过在线问卷收集参与者的特征、EBP 信息以及用于治疗 PFP 的干预措施。对数据进行描述性分析。采用逻辑回归分析调查干预措施与物理治疗师的特征及其对 EBP 的了解之间的关联。
194 名物理治疗师完成了问卷,其中 97.4%报告使用了髋关节和股四头肌联合强化锻炼,而只有 25.3%报告使用了足矫形器。许多物理治疗师还报告使用了不推荐的干预措施(如髌骨松动、腰椎、髋关节和膝关节松动/手法和生物物理剂)。具有硕士或博士学位的物理治疗师和了解临床实践指南的物理治疗师分别更有可能使用推荐的干预措施,其可能性分别是 2.57 倍和 3.81 倍。
大多数巴西物理治疗师选择的干预措施与当前科学证据相符。然而,仍有相当数量的物理治疗师使用不推荐用于治疗 PFP 的干预措施。