Suppr超能文献

非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者临床试验理解的年龄差异。

Age Differences in Clinical Trial Understanding in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Jul;22(7):e549-e554. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials are often an important component of cancer care but are misunderstood by many patients. Few studies have examined age differences in clinical trial understanding in older versus younger adults, especially among patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), a slowly progressive and not typically curable cancer diagnosed primarily in older adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Participants aged ≥21 years with a diagnosis of NHL were recruited from a single academic medical center in an urban setting. Age was dichotomized as <65 and ≥65 years. Clinical trial understanding was assessed using a four-item survey of potential goals of a clinical trial, with responses including "yes," "no," and "I don't know." Survey responses were examined by age using Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

The sample was comprised of 74 patients who were predominantly non-Latino White, with a mean age of 60.4 years (SD = 12.27). Compared to younger patients, older patients were more likely to respond "I don't know" to the clinical trial goals of reducing the lymphoma (41.4% vs. 13.3%; P = .023) and keeping the lymphoma from worsening (41.4% vs. 13.3%; P = .017). Age differences for the remaining goals were not statistically significant. Similar findings emerged when the sample was restricted to patients under active surveillance.

CONCLUSION

Relative to younger adults, older adults may have a less nuanced understanding of clinical trial goals. Therefore, older adults may benefit from developmentally-tailored interventions to improve clinical trial understanding. Future research should examine the relationship between clinical trial understanding and enrollment by age using validated measures in diverse samples.

摘要

背景

临床试验通常是癌症治疗的重要组成部分,但许多患者对此存在误解。很少有研究调查过年龄对临床试验理解的影响,尤其是在年龄较大的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者中,这种癌症进展缓慢,通常无法治愈,主要在老年人中诊断。

患者和方法

在一个城市环境中的一家学术医学中心招募了年龄≥21 岁且患有 NHL 的参与者。年龄分为<65 岁和≥65 岁。使用一个包含四项潜在临床试验目标的调查评估临床试验理解程度,回答选项包括“是”、“否”和“不知道”。使用卡方检验按年龄分析调查回答。

结果

样本由 74 名患者组成,他们主要是非拉丁裔白人,平均年龄为 60.4 岁(SD=12.27)。与年轻患者相比,年长患者对减少淋巴瘤(41.4%比 13.3%;P=.023)和防止淋巴瘤恶化(41.4%比 13.3%;P=.017)这两个临床试验目标回答“不知道”的可能性更高。对于其余目标,年龄差异没有统计学意义。当将样本限制在正在接受主动监测的患者中时,也出现了类似的发现。

结论

与年轻成年人相比,年长成年人可能对临床试验目标的理解不够细致。因此,年长成年人可能受益于为提高临床试验理解而量身定制的发展干预措施。未来的研究应该使用验证过的方法在不同的样本中检查临床试验理解程度与年龄之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Age Differences in Clinical Trial Understanding in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Jul;22(7):e549-e554. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Rituximab: a review of its use in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Drugs. 2003;63(8):803-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00005.
5
6
Semen quality in non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a monocentric retrospective study.
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):16-25. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa266.
7
Barriers to inclusion of older adults in randomised controlled clinical trials on Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Nov;39(7):812-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with follicular lymphoma: a SEER-Medicare analysis.
Blood Neoplasia. 2025 Feb 21;2(2):100080. doi: 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100080. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical trial participation assessed by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106315. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106315. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
2
Association of Age at Cancer Diagnosis and Clinical Trial Participation.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037573. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37573.
4
Factors Associated With Age Disparities Among Cancer Clinical Trial Participants.
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1769-1773. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2055.
5
A stakeholder-driven approach to improve the informed consent process for palliative chemotherapy.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Aug;100(8):1527-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
6
The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:185-98. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_156686.
7
Cancer clinical trial participants' assessment of risk and benefit.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(1):8-16. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1034381. Epub 2015 May 1.
8
The Relationship of Health Literacy With Use of Digital Technology for Health Information: Implications for Public Health Practice.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Jul/Aug;23(4):380-387. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000366.
9
Improving the Evidence Base for Treating Older Adults With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 10;33(32):3826-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0319. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: an empirical analysis of recently closed trials.
Clin Trials. 2015 Feb;12(1):77-83. doi: 10.1177/1740774514558307. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验