Suppr超能文献

按年龄、性别、种族、民族和社会经济地位评估临床试验参与情况。

Clinical trial participation assessed by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.

机构信息

Aurora NCORP, Advocate Aurora Health, 960 N 12th St., Milwaukee, WI 53233, United States of America.

Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Aurora Health, 960 N 12th St., Milwaukee, WI 53233, United States of America.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106315. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106315. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Individual demographic data and socioeconomic status (SES) factors from Census block group data may help define groups with disadvantaged access to clinical trials.

METHODS

Individual demographic data from the Aurora Cancer Registry and SES factors corresponding to the Census block group of the patient's address were studied for a six-year period ending July 31, 2019.

RESULTS

The final study cohort included 39,968 patients (enrolled = 772, and not enrolled = 39,196). In univariate analysis, significantly fewer patients older than age 65 (p < 0.001) and fewer men (p < 0.001) were enrolled in clinical trials. Socioeconomic factors found to be significant during univariate analysis included: low household income (p < 0.001), percentage below the poverty line (p < 0.001), low percentage home ownership (p = 0.006), unemployment (p = 0.003), absence of a college degree (p = 0.037) and absence of a high school degree (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, patients older than age 65 were less likely to participate in a trial (odds ratio 0.574, p < 0.001) and men were less likely to participate (odds ratio = 0.703, p < 0.001). Only 1.4% of the variance in clinical trial participation was accounted for demographic and SES factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The only groups with disadvantaged access to clinical trials in our institution were the elderly and men. Whether demographic or SES factors are related to accrual rates of clinical trials in other geographic regions or in other types of research studies warrants further investigation.

摘要

简介

个体人口统计学数据和社会经济地位(SES)因素来自普查街区组数据,可以帮助确定获得临床试验机会不足的群体。

方法

从奥罗拉癌症登记处获取个体人口统计学数据,并研究患者地址所在的普查街区组的 SES 因素,研究时间为 2019 年 7 月 31 日结束的六年期间。

结果

最终研究队列包括 39968 名患者(入组=772 人,未入组=39196 人)。在单变量分析中,年龄大于 65 岁的患者(p<0.001)和男性(p<0.001)入组临床试验的比例明显较低。单变量分析中发现具有统计学意义的社会经济因素包括:低收入家庭(p<0.001)、贫困线以下比例(p<0.001)、低住房拥有率(p=0.006)、失业(p=0.003)、无大学学历(p=0.037)和无高中学历(p=0.007)。在多变量分析中,年龄大于 65 岁的患者参与试验的可能性较低(优势比 0.574,p<0.001),男性参与试验的可能性较低(优势比=0.703,p<0.001)。人口统计学和 SES 因素仅解释了临床试验参与度 1.4%的差异。

结论

在我们的机构中,只有老年人和男性这两个群体获得临床试验的机会不足。人口统计学或 SES 因素是否与其他地理区域或其他类型的研究中的临床试验入组率有关,值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Clinical trial participation assessed by age, sex, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106315. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106315. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
3
Tuberculosis and race/ethnicity in the United States: impact of socioeconomic status.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Apr;157(4 Pt 1):1016-20. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.9704036.
5
Labor market participation among young adults: an event history analysis.
Youth Soc. 1989 Sep;21(1):3-31. doi: 10.1177/0044118x89021001001.
6
The influence of race and socioeconomic status on therapeutic clinical trial screening and enrollment.
J Neurooncol. 2020 May;148(1):131-139. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03503-x. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
7
Patient income level and cancer clinical trial participation.
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):536-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.4553. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
8
How socioeconomic status affects birth and death rates in rural Kerala, India: results of a health study.
Int J Health Serv. 1993;23(2):373-86. doi: 10.2190/9N4P-F1L2-13HM-CQVW.
10
Socioeconomic Disparities in Pediatric Single-Sided Deafness.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct;163(4):829-834. doi: 10.1177/0194599820923634. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

2
Virtual Data Collection Strategies in Research on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD).
Innov Aging. 2025 Mar 15;9(5):igaf026. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf026. eCollection 2025.
5
Disparities in Clinical Trial Participation in Children and Adolescent Patients With a Hematologic Malignancy.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2025 Jun;72(6):e31641. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31641. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
6
7
Clinical Trial Participation Motivation: Role of Smoking Status.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;13(4):389. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040389.
10
Effects of socioeconomic status on enrollment in clinical trials for cancer: A systematic review.
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6905. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6905. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

3
Contextual effects and cancer outcomes in the United States: a systematic review of characteristics in multilevel analyses.
Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):739-748.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
Accrual of Older Patients With Breast Cancer to Alliance Systemic Therapy Trials Over Time: Protocol A151527.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;35(4):421-431. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4182. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
5
Enrollment Trends and Disparity Among Patients With Lung Cancer in National Clinical Trials, 1990 to 2012.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):3992-3999. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.7088. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
6
Research on neighborhood effects on health in the United States: A systematic review of study characteristics.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;168:16-29. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.047. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
7
Patient Income Level and Cancer Clinical Trial Participation: A Prospective Survey Study.
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):137-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3924.
8
Strategies addressing barriers to clinical trial enrollment of underrepresented populations: a systematic review.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Nov;39(2):169-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
9
Participation of the elderly population in clinical trials: barriers and solutions.
Cancer Control. 2014 Jul;21(3):209-14. doi: 10.1177/107327481402100305.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验