Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5458-5467. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08682-x. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
3D chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI enables accurate and precise quantification of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2*, biomarkers of hepatic fat and iron deposition. Unfortunately, 3D CSE-MRI requires reliable breath-holding. Free-breathing 2D CSE-MRI with sequential radiofrequency excitation is a motion-robust alternative but suffers from low signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). To overcome this limitation, this work explores the combination of flip angle-modulated (FAM) 2D CSE imaging with a non-local means (NLM) motion-corrected averaging technique.
In this prospective study, 35 healthy subjects (27 children/8 adults) were imaged on a 3T MRI-system. Multi-echo 3D CSE ("3D") and 2D CSE FAM ("FAM") images were acquired during breath-hold and free-breathing, respectively, to obtain PDFF and R2* maps of the liver. Multi-repetition FAM was postprocessed with direct averaging (DA)- and NLM-based averaging and compared to 3D CSE using Bland-Altmann and regression analysis. Image qualities of PDFF and R2* maps were reviewed by two radiologists using a Likert-like scale (score 1-5, 5 = best).
Compared to 3D CSE, multi-repetition FAM-NLM showed excellent agreement (regression slope = 1.0, R = 0.996) for PDFF and good agreement (regression slope 1.08-1.15, R ≥ 0.899) for R2*. Further, multi-repetition FAM-NLM PDFF and R2* maps had fewer artifacts (score 3.8 vs. 3.2, p < 0.0001 for PDFF; score 3.2 vs. 2.6, p < 0.001 for R2*) and better overall image quality (score 4.0 vs. 3.5, p < 0.0001 for PDFF; score 3.4 vs. 2.7, p < 0.0001 for R2*).
Free-breathing FAM-NLM provides superior image quality of the liver compared to the conventional breath-hold 3D CSE-MRI, while minimizing bias for PDFF and R2* quantification.
• 2D CSE FAM-NLM is a free-breathing method for liver fat and iron quantification and viable alternative for patients unable to hold their breath. • 2D CSE FAM-NLM is a feasible alternative to breath-hold 3D CSE methods, with low bias in proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and no clinically significant bias in R2*. • Quantitatively, multiple repetitions in 2D CSE FAM-NLM lead to improved SNR.
3D 化学位移编码(CSE)MRI 能够准确、精确地定量质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)和 R2*,这是肝脂肪和铁沉积的生物标志物。不幸的是,3D CSE-MRI 需要可靠的屏气。具有连续射频激发的自由呼吸 2D CSE-MRI 是一种运动稳健的替代方法,但信号噪声比(SNR)较低。为了克服这一限制,本研究探索了翻转角调制(FAM)2D CSE 成像与非局部均值(NLM)运动校正平均技术的结合。
在这项前瞻性研究中,35 名健康受试者(27 名儿童/8 名成人)在 3T MRI 系统上进行了成像。在屏气和自由呼吸期间分别采集多回波 3D CSE(“3D”)和 2D CSE FAM(“FAM”)图像,以获得肝脏的 PDFF 和 R2图。使用直接平均(DA)和基于 NLM 的平均对多重复 FAM 进行后处理,并与 3D CSE 进行 Bland-Altman 和回归分析比较。两位放射科医生使用类似李克特的量表(评分 1-5,5=最佳)对 PDFF 和 R2图的图像质量进行了回顾。
与 3D CSE 相比,多重复 FAM-NLM 对 PDFF 具有极好的一致性(回归斜率=1.0,R=0.996),对 R2具有良好的一致性(回归斜率 1.08-1.15,R≥0.899)。此外,多重复 FAM-NLM PDFF 和 R2图的伪影更少(PDFF 评分为 3.8 分 vs. 3.2 分,p<0.0001;R2* 评分为 3.2 分 vs. 2.6 分,p<0.001),整体图像质量更好(PDFF 评分为 4.0 分 vs. 3.5 分,p<0.0001;R2* 评分为 3.4 分 vs. 2.7 分,p<0.0001)。
与传统的屏气 3D CSE-MRI 相比,自由呼吸 FAM-NLM 可提供肝脏的更高质量图像,同时最小化 PDFF 和 R2*定量的偏倚。
• 2D CSE FAM-NLM 是一种用于肝脏脂肪和铁定量的自由呼吸方法,是无法屏气的患者的可行替代方法。• 2D CSE FAM-NLM 是屏气 3D CSE 方法的可行替代方法,PDFF 偏倚小,R2*无临床显著偏倚。• 定量上,2D CSE FAM-NLM 的多次重复可提高 SNR。