University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health Philadelphia, PA.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:621-630. eCollection 2021.
Review transitions in care clinical decision support system (CDSS) implementation studies and describe human factors considerations in users, design, alert types, intervention timing, and implementation outcomes. Literature review in PubMed guided by subject matter experts. Twelve articles were included. Targeted users included physicians, nurses, pharmacists, or interdisciplinary teams. Alerts were deployed via email, cloud-based software, or the EHR in inpatient and/or outpatient settings. Outcome measures varied across articles, with mixed performance. There were six readmissions-focused, two prescribing, one laboratory, two prescribing and laboratory, and one discharge disposition CDSS. Few articles reported statistically significant differences in outcomes, and many reported alert fatigue. Despite the increasing prevalence of CDSS for transitions in care, few articles describe implementation processes and outcomes, and evidence of clinical practice improvement is mixed. Future studies should utilize implementation science frameworks and incorporate appropriate implementation outcomes in addition to traditional clinical outcomes like readmission rates.
回顾过渡护理临床决策支持系统 (CDSS) 实施研究,并描述用户、设计、警报类型、干预时机和实施结果中的人为因素考虑因素。在主题专家的指导下,在 PubMed 中进行文献回顾。共纳入 12 篇文章。目标用户包括医生、护士、药剂师或跨学科团队。警报通过电子邮件、基于云的软件或电子病历在住院和/或门诊环境中部署。文章的测量结果各不相同,表现也参差不齐。有 6 篇是针对再入院的,2 篇是针对处方的,1 篇是针对实验室的,2 篇是针对处方和实验室的,1 篇是针对出院处置的 CDSS。很少有文章报告结果有统计学上的显著差异,许多文章报告了警报疲劳。尽管过渡护理 CDSS 的使用越来越普遍,但很少有文章描述实施过程和结果,临床实践改善的证据也参差不齐。未来的研究应利用实施科学框架,并除了传统的临床结果(如再入院率)外,还应纳入适当的实施结果。