Zhang Jun-Jun, Yu Li, Mei Jun-Hui, Wang Hong-Xin, Gao Hai-Xiang, Fu Ju-Fang, Cheng Ye, Gao Lu-Lu, Bu Lei, Yu Jian-Qiang, Wang Carol Chunfeng, Li Yu-Xiang
Department of Hematology and Oncology, International Cancer Center, Shenzhen Key Laboratory, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University Clinical Medical Academy, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Xueyuan Avenue 1098, Shenzhen 518000, China.
School of Nursing, Ningxia Medical University, 1160 Sheng Li Street, Yinchuan, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Mar 10;2022:6406383. doi: 10.1155/2022/6406383. eCollection 2022.
Acute pain is a prevalent problem for dementia residents in nursing homes. A variety of intervention strategies have been applied to address this problem. However, there remains an issue of inadequate pain control. This study aims to explore the analgesic efficacy of auricular acupressure (AA) for dementia residents with acute pain in nursing homes.
A multicenter, single-blind, randomized, and sham-controlled clinical trial was performed in three nursing homes in Yinchuan, China. All of the 206 eligible patients with acute pain were randomly divided into two groups for real AA therapy or sham AA (at sham point stimulation) therapy. The primary outcome was measured with a face pain scale revised (FPS-R) score before the procedure, 5 min after the start of the intervention, and 5 min after finishing the procedure. Secondary outcomes covered three physiological parameters, adverse reactions observed, satisfaction level of caregivers, acceptance of patients, and additional use of analgesics.
There was a significant difference in pain scores based on FPS-R between the two groups ( < 0.01). Pain score in the true AA group was 1.84 ± 0.23, compared with 2.22 ± 0.81 in the sham AA group. No adverse events were found during the whole procedure for all patients. The satisfaction level of caregivers and acceptance of patients in the real AA group were significantly higher than those in the sham AA group.
This study shows that real AA was an alternative analgesic modality in reducing acute pain in patients with mild dementia.
急性疼痛是养老院痴呆症患者普遍存在的问题。已应用多种干预策略来解决这一问题。然而,疼痛控制不足的问题仍然存在。本研究旨在探讨耳穴按压(AA)对养老院急性疼痛痴呆症患者的镇痛效果。
在中国银川的三家养老院进行了一项多中心、单盲、随机、假对照临床试验。所有206例符合条件的急性疼痛患者被随机分为两组,分别接受真正的耳穴按压治疗或假耳穴按压(在假穴位刺激)治疗。主要结局指标是在治疗前、干预开始后5分钟和治疗结束后5分钟用修订的面部疼痛量表(FPS-R)评分进行测量。次要结局指标包括三个生理参数、观察到的不良反应、护理人员的满意度、患者的接受度以及镇痛药的额外使用情况。
两组基于FPS-R的疼痛评分存在显著差异(<0.01)。真正耳穴按压组的疼痛评分为1.84±0.23,而假耳穴按压组为2.22±0.81。所有患者在整个过程中均未发现不良事件。真正耳穴按压组护理人员的满意度和患者的接受度显著高于假耳穴按压组。
本研究表明,真正的耳穴按压是减轻轻度痴呆患者急性疼痛的一种替代镇痛方式。