Master Program in Long-Term Care, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
School of Nursing, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):822-829. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
To compare the efficacy of acupressure with sham acupressure in older-adult nursing home residents presenting with poor sleep quality and psychological distress.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.
Sixty-two nursing home residents with poor sleep quality and psychological distress participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 31) receiving acupressure at true acupoints (Baihui, Juque, Neiguan, Tianzhu, and Yongchung) or control group (n = 31) receiving acupressure at sham points. All participants received 20 minutes of acupressure before sleeping 3 times a week for 8 weeks. All participants were blinded to group allocation.
Sleep quality and psychological distress were measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Kessler Psychological Distress scale, respectively. Both groups' outcomes were assessed by assessors blinded to group allocation at the baseline, the end of the intervention, and 1 month after the intervention.
The experimental group demonstrated significantly more improvement in sleep quality than did the control group at the end of the intervention (10.5 vs 13.3) and 1 month after the intervention (8.3 vs 14.2; both P ≤ .001). Moreover, the experimental group had lower psychological distress levels than did the control group at 1 month after the intervention (14.6 vs 17.9, P = .05). Furthermore, significant differences in mean sleep quality (F = 60.8, P < .001) and psychological distress (F = 24.6, P < .001) were observed in the experimental group between the measurements at baseline and after the intervention.
Acupressure at true acupoints improves sleep quality, reduces psychological distress, and provides more clinically beneficial effects compared with that at sham points. Future studies should examine whether these effects are maintained in the long term.
比较穴位按压与假穴位按压对睡眠质量差和心理困扰的老年养老院居民的疗效。
前瞻性、随机、双盲、假对照试验。
62 名睡眠质量差和心理困扰的养老院居民参加了这项研究。参与者被随机分配到实验组(n=31),接受真穴位(百会、绝骨、内关、天柱和涌泉)的穴位按压,或对照组(n=31),接受假穴位的穴位按压。所有参与者在睡前接受 20 分钟的穴位按压,每周 3 次,共 8 周。所有参与者对分组分配均不知情。
使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数和凯斯勒心理困扰量表分别测量睡眠质量和心理困扰。在基线、干预结束时和干预结束后 1 个月,由对分组分配不知情的评估者评估两组的结果。
与对照组相比,实验组在干预结束时(10.5 对 13.3)和干预结束后 1 个月(8.3 对 14.2;均 P≤0.001)睡眠质量的改善更为显著。此外,实验组在干预结束后 1 个月的心理困扰水平低于对照组(14.6 对 17.9,P=0.05)。此外,实验组在基线和干预后测量之间,在平均睡眠质量(F=60.8,P<0.001)和心理困扰(F=24.6,P<0.001)方面存在显著差异。
与假穴位相比,真穴位按压可改善睡眠质量,减轻心理困扰,并提供更具临床益处的效果。未来的研究应探讨这些效果是否在长期内得以维持。