The Impaction of Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy for Lymphovascular Space Invasion of Early Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the lymphovascular space invasion between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One retrospective study was conducted with 391 patients treated with 242 patients underwent ARH and 149 patients underwent LRH between May 2010 and August 2019. We collected clinicopathological and perioperative outcome from medical records. We adopt Student's -test and Chi-square test was used to compare continuous and categorical variables between LRH and ARH.

RESULTS

Our research found that there was no difference in tumor size, histology, pathology grades, positive lymph nodes, and postoperative complications between LRH and ARH ( > 0.05). The estimated blooding loss (EBL) and length of postoperative hospital stay were less for LRH than ARH (248.12 ml vs. 412.56 ml, < 0.05, and 10.48 days vs. 15.16 days, < 0.05). The mean operative time was longer for LRH than ARH (227.51 min vs. 215.62 min, < 0.05). Significant difference was found in intraoperative complications ( < 0.05). However, LVSI was higher for LRH than ARH (36.8% vs. 19.8%, < 0.05). We discovered that the LVSI was related with International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology stage and tumor size.

CONCLUSION

Compared to ARH, the LRH would be advantageous for early cervical cancer in terms of EBL, length of postoperative hospital stay, and intraoperative complications. The ARH was superior to LRH in operative time. In addition to, LRH was more likely to lead to LVSI. Furthermore, when tumor size or stage was increasing, LRH was easily to generate LVSI. But, we cannot confirm recurrence rate is related to LVSI.