Madden Anne A, Oliverio Angela M, Kearns Patrick J, Henley Jessica B, Fierer Noah, Starks Philip T B, Wolfe Benjamin E, Romero L Michael, Lattin Christine R
Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
The Microbe Institute, Everett, MA 02149, USA.
J Exp Biol. 2022 Apr 1;225(7). doi: 10.1242/jeb.243176. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
There are complex interactions between an organism's microbiome and its response to stressors, often referred to as the 'gut-brain axis'; however, the ecological relevance of this axis in wild animals remains poorly understood. Here, we used a chronic mild stress protocol to induce stress in wild-caught house sparrows (Passer domesticus), and compared microbial communities among stressed animals, those recovering from stress, captive controls (unstressed) and a group not brought into captivity. We assessed changes in microbial communities and abundance of shed microbes by culturing cloacal samples on multiple media to select for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and fungi. We complemented this with cultivation-independent 16S and ITS rRNA gene amplification and sequencing, pairing these results with host physiological and immune metrics, including body mass change, relative spleen mass and plasma corticosterone concentrations. We found significant effects of stress and captivity on the house sparrow microbiomes, with stress leading to an increased relative abundance of endotoxin-producing bacteria - a possible mechanism for the hyperinflammatory response observed in captive avians. While we found evidence that the microbiome community partially recovers after stress cessation, animals may lose key taxa, and the abundance of endotoxin-producing bacteria persists. Our results suggest an overall link between chronic stress, host immune system and the microbiome, with the loss of potentially beneficial taxa (e.g. lactic acid bacteria), and an increase in endotoxin-producing bacteria due to stress and captivity. Ultimately, consideration of the host's microbiome may be useful when evaluating the impact of stressors on individual and population health.
生物体的微生物群与其对应激源的反应之间存在复杂的相互作用,通常被称为“肠-脑轴”;然而,这一轴在野生动物中的生态相关性仍知之甚少。在这里,我们使用慢性轻度应激方案对野生捕获的家麻雀(Passer domesticus)施加应激,并比较了应激动物、从应激中恢复的动物、圈养对照(未应激)动物和未被圈养的一组动物的微生物群落。我们通过在多种培养基上培养泄殖腔样本以筛选需氧菌、厌氧菌和真菌,评估了微生物群落的变化以及脱落微生物的丰度。我们通过不依赖培养的16S和ITS rRNA基因扩增及测序对其进行补充,并将这些结果与宿主的生理和免疫指标配对,包括体重变化、相对脾脏质量和血浆皮质酮浓度。我们发现应激和圈养对家麻雀微生物群有显著影响,应激导致产生内毒素的细菌相对丰度增加——这可能是圈养鸟类中观察到的炎症反应增强的一种机制。虽然我们发现有证据表明微生物群落应激停止后会部分恢复,但动物可能会失去关键分类群,且产生内毒素的细菌丰度仍然存在。我们的结果表明慢性应激、宿主免疫系统和微生物群之间存在整体联系,应激和圈养导致潜在有益分类群(如乳酸菌)丧失,以及产生内毒素的细菌增加。最终,在评估应激源对个体和种群健康的影响时,考虑宿主的微生物群可能会有所帮助。