University of South Florida, Department of Integrative Biology, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
J Exp Biol. 2011 Aug 1;214(Pt 15):2579-85. doi: 10.1242/jeb.057216.
Some species thrive in captivity but others exhibit extensive psychological and physiological deficits, which can be a challenge to animal husbandry and conservation as well as wild immunology. Here, we investigated whether captivity duration impacted the regulation of a key innate immune response, inflammation, of a common wild bird species, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Inflammation is one of the most commonly induced and fast-acting immune responses animals mount upon exposure to a parasite. However, attenuation and resolution of inflammatory responses are partly coordinated by glucocorticoid hormones, hormones that can be disregulated in captivity. Here, we tested whether captivity duration alters corticosterone regulation and hence the inflammatory response by comparing the following responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS; a Gram-negative bacteria component that induces inflammation) of birds caught wild and injected immediately versus those held for 2 or 4 weeks in standard conditions: (1) the magnitude of leukocyte immune gene expression [the cytokines, interleukin 1β and interleukin 6, and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)], (2) the rate of clearance of endotoxin, and (3) the release of corticosterone (CORT) in response to endotoxin (LPS). We predicted that captivity duration would increase baseline CORT and thus suppress gene expression and endotoxin clearance rate. However, our predictions were not supported: TLR4 expression increased with time in captivity irrespective of LPS, and cytokine expression to LPS was stronger the longer birds remained captive. Baseline CORT was not affected by captivity duration, but CORT release post-LPS occurred only in wild birds. Lastly, sparrows held captive for 4 weeks maintained significantly higher levels of circulating endotoxin than other groups, perhaps due to leakage of microbes from the gut, but exogenous LPS did not increase circulating levels over the time scale samples were collected. Altogether, captivity appears to have induced a hyper-inflammatory state in house sparrows, perhaps due to disregulation of glucocorticoids, natural microflora or both.
有些物种在圈养中茁壮成长,但其他物种则表现出广泛的心理和生理缺陷,这对动物饲养和保护以及野生动物免疫学都是一个挑战。在这里,我们研究了圈养时间是否会影响常见野生鸟类——家麻雀(Passer domesticus)关键先天免疫反应——炎症的调节。炎症是动物暴露于寄生虫时最常诱导和最快发生的免疫反应之一。然而,糖皮质激素激素可以部分协调炎症反应的衰减和缓解,而这些激素在圈养中可能会失调。在这里,我们通过比较以下两种情况来测试圈养时间是否会改变皮质酮的调节,从而改变炎症反应:一种是立即从野外捕获并注射脂多糖(LPS;一种诱导炎症的革兰氏阴性细菌成分)的鸟类,另一种是在标准条件下饲养 2 或 4 周的鸟类:(1)白细胞免疫基因表达的幅度[细胞因子白细胞介素 1β和白细胞介素 6 以及 Toll 样受体 4(TLR4)],(2)内毒素清除率,以及(3)对 LPS (LPS)的皮质酮(CORT)释放。我们预测,圈养时间会增加基础 CORT,从而抑制基因表达和内毒素清除率。然而,我们的预测并没有得到支持:TLR4 的表达随着圈养时间的增加而增加,而不管 LPS 如何,鸟类在圈养中停留的时间越长,细胞因子对 LPS 的表达就越强。基础 CORT 不受圈养时间的影响,但 LPS 后 CORT 的释放仅发生在野生鸟类中。最后,被圈养 4 周的麻雀保持着明显高于其他组的循环内毒素水平,这可能是由于肠道微生物的泄漏,但在收集样本的时间范围内,外源性 LPS 并未增加循环水平。总之,圈养似乎在家麻雀中引起了一种过度炎症状态,这可能是由于糖皮质激素、天然微生物群或两者的失调。