Döller G, Döller P C, Gerth H J
J Biol Stand. 1986 Jul;14(3):163-75. doi: 10.1016/0092-1157(86)90001-6.
Up to now, the complement fixation test (CFT) has been the basis for the serological diagnosis of influenza virus infection in routine laboratories. Generally, low CF titers (1:20 or 1:40) are difficult to interpret. This means that the differentiation between recent and remote influenza infections is not possible by CFTs on single sera. Nonetheless this is generally possible by the subtype- and immunoglobulin class-specific immunofluorescence test (IFT) reported in this paper. Sera from 76 patients with confirmed influenza infection were tested and we obtained the following results: only 27.6% contained antibodies of all immunoglobulin classes, 51% contained IgG and IgA antibodies (without IgM) and 3.9% responded only with the IgG isotype. The IFT-positive and CFT-negative were 5.2% and the IFT-negative and CFT-positive 4%. In 7.9% no antibody rises were detected by CFT or by IFT despite virus isolation. Results from IFT may permit the interpretation of low CF titers. In contrast to CFT, IFT makes possible the differentiation between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons because vaccinated persons regularly produce IgM antibodies against all strains of the vaccine.
到目前为止,补体结合试验(CFT)一直是常规实验室中流感病毒感染血清学诊断的基础。一般来说,低补体结合滴度(1:20或1:40)难以解读。这意味着仅通过单份血清的补体结合试验无法区分近期和既往流感感染。尽管如此,通过本文报道的亚型和免疫球蛋白类别特异性免疫荧光试验(IFT)通常可以做到这一点。对76例确诊流感感染患者的血清进行了检测,我们得到以下结果:只有27.6%的血清含有所有免疫球蛋白类别的抗体,51%含有IgG和IgA抗体(无IgM),3.9%仅对IgG同种型有反应。免疫荧光试验阳性而补体结合试验阴性的占5.2%,免疫荧光试验阴性而补体结合试验阳性的占4%。尽管进行了病毒分离,但在7.9%的病例中,补体结合试验或免疫荧光试验均未检测到抗体升高。免疫荧光试验的结果可能有助于解读低补体结合滴度。与补体结合试验不同,免疫荧光试验能够区分接种疫苗者和未接种疫苗者,因为接种疫苗者通常会产生针对所有疫苗株的IgM抗体。