Sheila Sherlock Liver UnitRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and Institute for Liver and Digestive HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK.
The Anthony Nolan Research InstituteRoyal Free London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK.
Liver Transpl. 2022 Aug;28(8):1306-1320. doi: 10.1002/lt.26458. Epub 2022 May 4.
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching is not routinely performed for liver transplantation as there is no consistent evidence of benefit; however, the impact of HLA mismatching remains uncertain. We explored the effect of class I and II HLA mismatching on graft failure and mortality. A total of 1042 liver transplants performed at a single center between 1999 and 2016 with available HLA typing data were included. The median follow-up period was 9.38 years (interquartile range 4.9-14) and 350/1042 (33.6%) transplants resulted in graft loss and 280/1042 (26.9%) in death. Graft loss and mortality were not associated with the overall number of mismatches at HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ loci. However, graft failure and mortality were both increased in HLA mismatching on graft failure and mortality the presence of one (p = 0.004 and p = 0.01, respectively) and two (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively) HLA-A mismatches. Elevated hazard ratios for graft failure and death were observed with HLA-A mismatches in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Excess graft loss with HLA-A mismatch (138/940 [14.7%] mismatched compared with 6/102 [5.9%] matched transplants) occurred within the first year following transplantation (odds ratio 2.75; p = 0.02). Strikingly, transplants performed at a single all grafts lost due to hepatic artery thrombosis were in HLA-A-mismatched transplants (31/940 vs. 0/102), as were those lost due to sepsis (35/940 vs. 0/102). In conclusion, HLA-A mismatching was associated with increased graft loss and mortality. The poorer outcome for the HLA-mismatched group was due to hepatic artery thrombosis and sepsis, and these complications occurred exclusively with HLA-A-mismatched transplants. These data suggest that HLA-A mismatching is important for outcomes following liver transplant. Therefore, knowledge of HLA-A matching status may potentially allow for enhanced surveillance, clinical interventions in high-risk transplants or stratified HLA-A matching in high-risk recipients.
人类白细胞抗原(HLA)配型在肝移植中并不常规进行,因为没有一致的获益证据;然而,HLA 错配的影响仍不确定。我们探讨了 HLA I 类和 II 类错配对移植物失功和死亡率的影响。纳入了 1999 年至 2016 年在一个中心进行的 1042 例肝移植,这些肝移植均有 HLA 分型数据。中位随访时间为 9.38 年(四分位间距 4.9-14),350/1042(33.6%)例发生移植物失功,280/1042(26.9%)例死亡。HLA-A、HLA-B、HLA-C、HLA-DR 和 HLA-DQ 位点的 HLA 错配总数与移植物失功和死亡率无关。然而,在存在 1 个(p=0.004 和 p=0.01)和 2 个(p=0.01 和 p=0.04)HLA-A 错配的情况下,移植物失功和死亡率均增加(p=0.004 和 p=0.01)。单因素和多因素 Cox 比例风险模型显示,HLA-A 错配与移植物失功和死亡的风险比升高。HLA-A 错配导致的移植物额外失功(940 例中有 138 例[14.7%]错配与 102 例中有 6 例[5.9%]匹配的移植)发生在移植后 1 年内(优势比 2.75;p=0.02)。令人惊讶的是,所有因肝动脉血栓形成导致移植物丢失的移植均发生在 HLA-A 错配的移植中(31/940 例与 0/102 例),因感染导致的移植丢失也均发生在 HLA-A 错配的移植中(35/940 例与 0/102 例)。总之,HLA-A 错配与移植物失功和死亡率增加相关。HLA 错配组的不良结局归因于肝动脉血栓形成和感染,这些并发症仅发生在 HLA-A 错配的移植中。这些数据表明,HLA-A 错配对肝移植后结局很重要。因此,对 HLA-A 配型状态的了解可能有助于加强高危移植的监测、临床干预,或对高危受者进行 HLA-A 配型分层。