Division of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1704-1710. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06527-8. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective treatment for benign thyroid nodules. However, it remains unclear if ablating multiple nodules in single-session offers comparable safety and efficacy to ablating single nodule. Our study compared early complication rate and 6-month nodule shrinkage between multiple-nodules ablation and single-nodule ablation by RFA.
Among the 174 eligible patients undergoing RFA of one or more benign thyroid nodules, 85 (48.8%) had single-nodule ablation (group I) while 89 (51.1%) had two or three nodules ablation (group II). The 6-month nodule shrinkage of each nodule (by volume reduction ratio) (VRR) was calculated by (Baseline volume - volume at 6-month)/(Baseline volume)*100 and compared between two groups. To determine independent predictors for VRR, a multivariate analysis was done by logistic regression analysis.
Patients in group II reported significantly higher pain scores during and 2-h after treatment than group I (42.31 vs. 29.66, p = 0.029 and 38.21 vs. 26.18, p = 0.037, respectively). Two vocal cord paresis occurred in each group. 3- and 6-month VRR of the largest nodule were comparable between two groups (67.39% vs. 63.89%, p = 0.248 and 77.29% vs. 73.38%, p = 0.182). Similar 3- and 6-month VRR were observed for 2 and 3 largest nodules in group II. In multivariate analysis, total energy given per nodule volume (OR = 1.007, 95% CI = 1.001-1.012, p = 0.036) was the only independent predictor for 6-month VRR.
In the presence of multinodular goiter, ablating two or more nodules by RFA within one session appears to offer a comparable level of safety and efficacy to ablating single nodule.
射频消融(RFA)是治疗良性甲状腺结节的有效方法。然而,目前尚不清楚单次消融多个结节是否与单次消融单个结节具有相当的安全性和疗效。我们的研究比较了 RFA 治疗单个和多个结节的早期并发症发生率和 6 个月时结节缩小率。
在 174 例接受 RFA 治疗的一个或多个良性甲状腺结节患者中,85 例(48.8%)进行了单个结节消融(I 组),89 例(51.1%)进行了两个或三个结节消融(II 组)。每个结节的 6 个月结节缩小率(按体积减少率(VRR)计算)[(基础体积-6 个月时的体积)/基础体积]*100,并比较两组之间的差异。为了确定 VRR 的独立预测因素,采用 logistic 回归分析进行了多变量分析。
II 组患者在治疗中和治疗后 2 小时的疼痛评分明显高于 I 组(42.31 比 29.66,p=0.029 和 38.21 比 26.18,p=0.037)。两组均有 2 例声带麻痹。两组最大结节的 3 个月和 6 个月 VRR 无差异(67.39%比 63.89%,p=0.248 和 77.29%比 73.38%,p=0.182)。II 组中 2 个和 3 个最大结节的 3 个月和 6 个月 VRR 也相似。多变量分析显示,每个结节给予的总能量与结节体积的比值(OR=1.007,95%CI=1.001-1.012,p=0.036)是 6 个月 VRR 的唯一独立预测因素。
在多结节性甲状腺肿的情况下,RFA 单次消融多个结节似乎与单次消融单个结节具有相当的安全性和疗效。