Ducoli Serena, Fahimi Ario, Mousa Elsayed, Ye Guozhu, Federici Stefania, Frontera Patrizia, Bontempi Elza
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, INSTM and Chemistry for Technologies Laboratory, University of Brescia, Via Branze 38, Brescia 25123, Italy.
SWERIM AB, Aronstorpsvägen 1, Luleå SE-97437, Sweden.
Data Brief. 2022 Mar 9;42:108018. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108018. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Recovering critical raw materials from end-of-life batteries is mandatory to limit the need of virgin resources in the long-term. However, most of the recycling of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) technologies are still in an infancy stage. As a result, to date, only few studies focus on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the proposed processes, presenting limited results. This paper reports the methodology and data resulting from sustainability evaluation of 33 different technologies for spent LIBs recovery, on the basis of the availability of information, identified in literature. The ESCAPE (standing for Evaluation of Sustainability of material substitution using CArbon footPrint by a simplified approach) method is based on the use of only two parameters: the embodied energy and the carbon footprint. These parameters are calculated for all the process steps of each technology. Using the ESCAPE approach, the data about energies and emissions associated with the electricity consumption for thermal and mechanical treatments and chemicals and water use are calculated for all the 33 selected technologies, referring to a recent work (Fahimi et a., 2022), which only presents the results. In addition, ESCAPE tool is used to evaluate and discuss the parameters that can affect the technologies sustainability, to better highlight the most onerous and impactful steps of each technology. Then, this paper also shows that ESCAPE approach allows to propose some strategies to improve the recovery processes, with the aim to support eco-design.
从报废电池中回收关键原材料对于长期限制原生资源的需求至关重要。然而,大多数锂离子电池(LIBs)回收技术仍处于起步阶段。因此,迄今为止,只有少数研究关注所提出工艺的生命周期评估(LCA),结果有限。本文报告了基于文献中确定的信息可用性,对33种不同的废旧LIBs回收技术进行可持续性评估所得到的方法和数据。ESCAPE(代表通过简化方法使用碳足迹评估材料替代的可持续性)方法仅基于两个参数:隐含能源和碳足迹。针对每种技术的所有工艺步骤计算这些参数。使用ESCAPE方法,参考最近的一项工作(法希米等人,2022年),计算了所有33种选定技术与热处理、机械处理的电力消耗以及化学品和水的使用相关的能源和排放数据,该工作仅展示了结果。此外,ESCAPE工具用于评估和讨论可能影响技术可持续性的参数,以更好地突出每种技术最繁重和最具影响力的步骤。然后,本文还表明ESCAPE方法允许提出一些改进回收工艺的策略,旨在支持生态设计。