Li Zhiyong, Feng Chen, Tang Ying
School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 555 Liutai Avenue, Chengdu, 611130 Sichuan China.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Financial Security, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 555 Liutai Avenue, Chengdu, 611130 China.
Ann Oper Res. 2022;315(1):279-315. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04597-4. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
For decades, the prediction of bank failure has been a popular topic in credit risk and banking studies. Statistical and machine learning methods have been working well in predicting the probability of bankruptcy for different time horizons prior to the failure. In recent years, bank efficiency has attracted much interest from academic circles, where low productivity or efficiency in banks has been regarded as a potential reason for failure. It is generally believed that low efficiency implies low-quality management of the organisation, which may lead to bad performance in the competitive financial markets. Previous papers linking efficiency measures calculated by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to bank failure prediction have been limited to cross sectional analyses. A dynamic analysis with the updated samples is therefore recommended for bankruptcy prediction. This paper proposes a nonparametric method, Malmquist DEA with Worst Practice Frontier, to dynamically assess the bankruptcy risk of banks over multiple periods. A total sample of 4426 US banks over a period of 15 years (2002-2016), covering the subprime financial crisis, is used to empirically test the model. A static model is used as the benchmark, and we introduce more extensions for comparisons of predictive performance. Results of the comparisons and robustness tests show that Malmquist DEA is a useful tool not only for estimating productivity growth but also to give early warnings of the potential collapse of banks. The extended DEA models with various reference sets and orientations also show strong predictive power.
几十年来,银行倒闭预测一直是信用风险和银行业研究中的热门话题。统计和机器学习方法在预测银行倒闭前不同时间范围内的破产概率方面一直表现良好。近年来,银行效率引起了学术界的广泛关注,银行生产率或效率低下被视为银行倒闭的一个潜在原因。人们普遍认为,效率低下意味着组织管理质量低下,这可能导致在竞争激烈的金融市场中表现不佳。以往将数据包络分析(DEA)计算的效率指标与银行倒闭预测联系起来的论文仅限于横截面分析。因此,建议使用更新后的样本进行动态分析以进行破产预测。本文提出了一种非参数方法,即具有最差实践前沿的Malmquist DEA,用于动态评估银行在多个时期的破产风险。我们使用了4426家美国银行在15年(2002 - 2016年)期间的总样本,涵盖了次贷金融危机,对该模型进行实证检验。以静态模型作为基准,并引入更多扩展进行预测性能比较。比较结果和稳健性检验表明,Malmquist DEA不仅是估计生产率增长的有用工具,而且还能对银行潜在倒闭发出早期预警。具有各种参考集和方向的扩展DEA模型也显示出强大的预测能力。