Plagg Barbara, Piccoliori Giuliano, Engl Adolf, Wiedermann Christian J, Mahlknecht Angelika, Barbieri Verena, Ausserhofer Dietmar, Koler Peter, Tauber Sara, Lechner Manuela, Lorenz Walter A, Conca Andreas, Eisendle Klaus
Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Provincial College for Health Professions Claudiana, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Faculty of Education, Free University of Bolzano Bozen, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Mar 17;7(2):32. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7020032.
Nursing homes (NHs) have been among the care settings most affected by both the virus itself and collateral damage through infection protection and control measures (IPC). However, there is a paucity of research regarding disaster response and preparedness of these institutions. The present study aimed to analyze disaster response and management and to develop prospective strategies for disaster management in NHs. A qualitative survey including (i) residents, (ii) nursing staff, (iii) relatives of residents, and (iv) NHs' medical leads was performed. Data were collected by 45 in-depth interviews. Our results indicate that the shift from resident-centered care towards collective-protective approaches led through the suspending of established care principles to an emergency vacuum: implementable strategies were lacking and the subsequent development of temporary, immediate, and mostly suboptimal solutions by unprepared staff led to manifold organizational, medical, and ethical conflicts against the background of unclear legislation, changing protocols, and fear of legal consequences. IPC measures had long-lasting effects on the health and wellbeing of residents, relatives, and professionals. Without disaster preparedness protocols and support in decision-making during disasters, professionals in NHs are hardly able to cope with emergency situations.
养老院一直是受病毒本身以及感染预防与控制措施(IPC)所带来的附带损害影响最严重的照护场所之一。然而,关于这些机构的灾难应对和准备工作的研究却很匮乏。本研究旨在分析灾难应对与管理,并为养老院制定灾难管理的前瞻性策略。我们进行了一项定性调查,调查对象包括(i)居民、(ii)护理人员、(iii)居民亲属以及(iv)养老院的医疗负责人。通过45次深入访谈收集了数据。我们的结果表明,从以居民为中心的照护转向集体保护方法,由于既定照护原则的暂停导致了紧急情况的真空:缺乏可实施的策略,毫无准备的工作人员随后制定的临时、即时且大多不够理想的解决方案,在立法不明、规程不断变化以及担心法律后果的背景下,引发了诸多组织、医疗和伦理冲突。IPC措施对居民、亲属和专业人员的健康与福祉产生了持久影响。如果没有灾难准备预案以及在灾难期间的决策支持,养老院的专业人员很难应对紧急情况。