• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放获取的重新定义:Sci-Hub 在骨科研究中的影响的调查数据和文献研究。

Open Access Redefined: Survey Data and Literature Study on the Impact of Sci-Hub in Orthopaedic Research.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Chirurgisches Zentrum, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Z Orthop Unfall. 2023 Dec;161(6):648-653. doi: 10.1055/a-1773-1268. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1055/a-1773-1268
PMID:35315005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since Alexandra Elbanyan founded Sci-Hub in 2011, the website has been used by a growing number of researchers worldwide. Sci-Hub is a so-called shadow library or guerrilla open access format bypassing publishers' paywalls, giving everyone free access to scientific papers. Until today, there have been no publications about usage by orthopaedic and trauma surgeons of Sci-Hub or other "pirate sites" and how it may influence their work.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Orthopaedic and trauma surgeons of four university hospitals in Germany and Europe were consulted using a standardised questionnaire containing multiple items about the use and evaluation of Sci-Hub. In addition, the Medline and Cochrane databases were screened for all studies related to Sci-Hub. Two reviewers independently reviewed all articles and the references of these articles.

RESULTS

Of all orthopaedic surgeons consulted, 69% knew of Sci-Hub and 66.7% used it on a regular basis. Of the younger participants (< 45 years old), 77% knew the webpage, while only 25% of older participants (> 45 years old) knew the webpage. Ninety percent found the quality of their citation and research had been enhanced since using Sci-Hub. On a scale of 1 to 10, user-friendliness was rated with a mean rating of 7.58 (95% CI: 7.262-7.891). Ethical or legal concerns among users seem mixed. On a scale of 1 (no concerns) to 5 (many concerns), the mean score was 2.39 (95% CI: 2.154-2.615). Of doctors using Sci-Hub, 89% would recommend it to other colleagues.

CONCLUSION

The quality and number of articles in Sci-Hub is outstanding, and the rate of young researchers using the website is high. The most important shift in literature research for decades is a phenomenon mostly used by young researchers and is not the subject of current research itself. Sci-Hub may have already changed how orthopaedic research works.

摘要

背景

自 2011 年 Alexandra Elbanyan 创立 Sci-Hub 以来,该网站在全球范围内被越来越多的研究人员使用。Sci-Hub 是一种所谓的影子图书馆或游击式开放获取格式,绕过出版商的付费墙,让每个人都能免费访问科学论文。直到今天,还没有关于矫形和创伤外科医生使用 Sci-Hub 或其他“盗版网站”的出版物,以及它如何影响他们的工作。

材料和方法

德国和欧洲的四家大学医院的矫形和创伤外科医生使用标准化问卷进行了咨询,问卷包含有关 Sci-Hub 使用和评估的多项内容。此外,还对 Medline 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了筛选,以查找所有与 Sci-Hub 相关的研究。两名审查员独立审查了所有文章及其参考文献。

结果

所有接受咨询的矫形外科医生中,有 69%知道 Sci-Hub,66.7%定期使用它。在年轻参与者(<45 岁)中,有 77%知道该网页,而在年长参与者(>45 岁)中,只有 25%知道该网页。90%的人发现使用 Sci-Hub 后,他们的引文和研究质量得到了提高。在 1 到 10 的范围内,用户友好度的平均评分为 7.58(95%置信区间:7.262-7.891)。用户的道德或法律顾虑似乎各不相同。在 1(无顾虑)到 5(顾虑很多)的范围内,平均得分为 2.39(95%置信区间:2.154-2.615)。使用 Sci-Hub 的医生中有 89%会向其他同事推荐它。

结论

Sci-Hub 的文章质量和数量都非常出色,使用该网站的年轻研究人员的比例也很高。几十年来文献研究最重要的转变是一种主要被年轻研究人员使用的现象,而不是当前研究本身的主题。Sci-Hub 可能已经改变了矫形研究的工作方式。

相似文献

1
Open Access Redefined: Survey Data and Literature Study on the Impact of Sci-Hub in Orthopaedic Research.开放获取的重新定义:Sci-Hub 在骨科研究中的影响的调查数据和文献研究。
Z Orthop Unfall. 2023 Dec;161(6):648-653. doi: 10.1055/a-1773-1268. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
2
Worldwide inequality in access to full text scientific articles: the example of ophthalmology.全球获取全文科学文章的不平等现象:以眼科为例。
PeerJ. 2019 Oct 30;7:e7850. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7850. eCollection 2019.
3
Looking into Pandora's Box: The Content of and its Usage.窥探潘多拉魔盒:其内容及用途
F1000Res. 2017 Apr 21;6:541. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11366.1. eCollection 2017.
4
Awareness of predatory journals and open access publishing among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons - results from an online survey in Germany.德国骨科与创伤外科医生对掠夺性期刊及开放获取出版的认知——一项在线调查结果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 17;22(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04223-7.
5
Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature.Sci-Hub 提供几乎所有学术文献的访问途径。
Elife. 2018 Mar 1;7:e32822. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32822.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research.骨科学术研究中的掠夺性出版。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):e138. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01569.
8
Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research.开放获取出版:骨科研究现状研究。
Int Orthop. 2014 Jun;38(6):1297-302. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2250-5. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
9
Sci-Hub: What Librarians Should Know and Do about Article Piracy.科学-学术资源共享网站(Sci-Hub):图书馆员应了解和应对的文章盗版问题。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2017 Jan-Mar;36(1):73-78. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1259918.
10
Sources of information influencing decision-making in orthopaedic surgery - an international online survey of 1147 orthopaedic surgeons.影响骨科手术决策的信息来源 - 对 1147 名骨科医生的国际在线调查。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 14;14:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-96.