• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济剥夺对城市学术医疗中心心脏移植评估的影响。

Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on evaluation for heart transplantation at an urban academic medical center.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Emory University Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2022 Jun;36(6):e14652. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14652. Epub 2022 May 3.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14652
PMID:35315535
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For patients with advanced heart failure, socioeconomic deprivation may impede referral for heart transplantation (HT). We examined the association of socioeconomic deprivation with listing among patients evaluated at our institution and compared this against the backdrop of our local community.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated for HT between January 2017 and December 2020. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded. Block group-level area deprivation index (ADI) decile was obtained at each patient's home address and Socioeconomic Status (SES) index was determined by patient zip code.

RESULTS

In total, 400 evaluations were initiated; one international patient was excluded. Among this population, 111 (27.8%) were women, 219 (54.9%) were White, 94 (23.6%) Black, and 59 (14.8%) Hispanic. 248 (62.2%) patients were listed for transplant. Listed patients had significantly higher SES index and lower ADI compared to those who were not listed. However, after adjustment for clinical factors, ADI and SESi were not predictive of listing. Similarly, patient sex, race, and insurance did not influence the likelihood of listing for HT. Notably, the distribution of the referral cohort based on ADI deciles was not reflective of our center's catchment area, indicating opportunities for improving access to transplant for disadvantaged populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although socioeconomic deprivation did not predict listing in our analysis, we recognize the need for broader outreach to combat upstream bias that prevents patients from being referred for HT.

摘要

简介

对于晚期心力衰竭患者,社会经济贫困可能会阻碍其接受心脏移植(HT)的转诊。我们研究了社会经济贫困与在我们机构接受评估的患者的列入名单之间的关系,并将其与我们当地社区的背景进行了比较。

方法

我们对 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受 HT 评估的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。记录了患者的人口统计学和临床特征。在每个患者的家庭住址获得街区组级别的区域贫困指数(ADI)十分位数,并根据患者邮政编码确定社会经济地位(SES)指数。

结果

总共有 400 次评估被启动;一名国际患者被排除在外。在这一人群中,111 名(27.8%)为女性,219 名(54.9%)为白人,94 名(23.6%)为黑人,59 名(14.8%)为西班牙裔。248 名(62.2%)患者被列入移植名单。与未被列入名单的患者相比,列入名单的患者 SES 指数更高,ADI 更低。然而,在校正临床因素后,ADI 和 SESi 并不能预测列入名单。同样,患者性别、种族和保险状况并不影响 HT 列入名单的可能性。值得注意的是,根据 ADI 十分位数分布的转诊队列与我们中心的服务区域并不相符,这表明有机会改善弱势群体获得移植的机会。

结论

尽管在我们的分析中,社会经济贫困并未预测列入名单,但我们认识到需要更广泛的宣传,以消除阻碍患者接受 HT 转诊的上游偏见。

相似文献

1
Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on evaluation for heart transplantation at an urban academic medical center.社会经济剥夺对城市学术医疗中心心脏移植评估的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Jun;36(6):e14652. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14652. Epub 2022 May 3.
2
Increased disparities in waitlist and post-heart transplantation outcomes according to socioeconomic status with the new heart transplant allocation system.新的心脏移植分配系统下,社会经济地位与等待名单和心脏移植后结果的差距加大。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jan;43(1):134-147. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
3
The effect of socioeconomic status on pediatric heart transplant outcomes at a single institution between 2013 and 2022.2013 年至 2022 年期间单家机构中社会经济地位对儿科心脏移植结局的影响。
Pediatr Transplant. 2024 Mar;28(2):e14695. doi: 10.1111/petr.14695.
4
The Impact of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage on Operative Outcomes after Single-Level Lumbar Fusion.社区社会经济劣势对单节段腰椎融合术后手术结果的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Dec;180:e440-e448. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.085. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
5
Evaluating the impact of social deprivation on Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey Scores.评估社会剥夺对 Press Ganey® 门诊医疗实践调查评分的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jun 19;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01639-y.
6
Critical interactions between race and the highly granular area deprivation index in liver transplant evaluation.种族与高度细化的区域剥夺指数在肝移植评估中的关键相互作用。
Clin Transplant. 2023 May;37(5):e14938. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14938. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
7
Outcomes of Multiple Listing for Adult Heart Transplantation in the United States: Analysis of OPTN Data From 2000 to 2013.美国成人心脏移植多重登记的结果:对2000年至2013年器官共享联合网络数据的分析
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Dec;3(12):933-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
8
Examining racial and socioeconomic disparity in the pediatric heart transplant evaluation.检查儿科心脏移植评估中的种族和社会经济差异。
Pediatr Transplant. 2021 Jun;25(4):e13979. doi: 10.1111/petr.13979. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Outcomes After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Using the Area Deprivation Index.利用地区贫困指数评估社会经济地位对心室辅助装置植入术后结局的影响。
J Card Fail. 2021 May;27(5):597-601. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.01.010.
10
High Socioeconomic Deprivation and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Outcomes: Insights From Michigan.高社会经济剥夺与冠状动脉旁路移植术结局:密歇根州的见解。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun;113(6):1962-1970. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The application of neighborhood area deprivation index to improve health equity across the spectrum of heart failure: a review.应用邻里地区贫困指数改善全谱心力衰竭患者的健康公平性:一项综述
Heart Fail Rev. 2025 May;30(3):589-604. doi: 10.1007/s10741-025-10492-4. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
2
Prejudice and Fear as Influences in Relation to a Successful Organ Donation - Experiences of Immigrants Living in Sweden.偏见与恐惧对瑞典移民成功进行器官捐赠的影响——来自移民的经验。
Acta Med Acad. 2024 Apr;53(1):35-45. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.432.
3
Editorial: Equity in Transplantation: A Commitment for Progress in Troubled Times.
社论:移植领域的公平性:动荡时期取得进展的承诺。
Transpl Int. 2022 Aug 24;35:10781. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10781. eCollection 2022.