Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS), University of Wollongong, Squires Way, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
WorldFish, Jalan Batu Maung, Batu Maung, 11960, Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.
Ambio. 2022 Oct;51(10):2107-2117. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01727-x. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
Livelihood diversification has become an integral focus of policies and investments aiming to reduce poverty, vulnerability, and pressure on fishery resources in coastal communities around the globe. In this regard, coastal fisheries in the Pacific Islands have long been a sector where livelihood diversification has featured prominently. Yet, despite the widespread promotion and international investment in this strategy, the ability of externally funded livelihood diversification projects to facilitate improved resource management and rural development outcomes often remains inconsistent. We argue these inconsistencies can be attributed to a conceptual ambiguity stemming from a lack of attention and awareness to the complexity of livelihood diversification. There is still much to learn about the process of livelihood diversification, both in its theoretical conceptualizations and its practical applications. Herein, we utilize a common diversity framework to clarify some of this ambiguity by distinguishing three diversification pathways. These pathways are illustrated using an ideal-typical Pacific Island coastal household and supported by examples provided in the literature that detail livelihood diversification projects in the Pacific. Through this perspective, we seek a more nuanced understanding of what is meant within the policy and practice goal of livelihood diversification. Thereby enabling more targeted and deliberate planning for development investments that facilitates outcomes in support of sustainable livelihoods.
生计多样化已成为全球沿海社区旨在减少贫困、脆弱性和渔业资源压力的政策和投资的一个核心关注点。在这方面,太平洋岛屿的沿海渔业长期以来一直是生计多样化的重点领域。然而,尽管人们广泛宣传和在国际上投资这一战略,但外部资助的生计多样化项目促进资源管理和农村发展成果的能力往往仍然不一致。我们认为,这种不一致性可以归因于概念上的模糊性,这是由于缺乏对生计多样化复杂性的关注和认识。在生计多样化的过程中,无论是在理论概念化还是实际应用方面,仍有许多需要学习的地方。在此,我们利用一个通用的多样性框架,通过区分三种多样化途径来澄清这种模糊性。这些途径通过一个理想化的太平洋岛屿沿海家庭来举例说明,并通过文献中提供的详细说明太平洋岛屿生计多样化项目的例子来支持。通过这种观点,我们试图更深入地理解生计多样化在政策和实践目标中的含义。从而能够更有针对性和深思熟虑地规划发展投资,以支持可持续生计。