Gambella Agriculture Research Institution, Department of Socio-Economic and Agricultural Extension, Gambela, Ethiopia.
Jimma University, Department of Rural Development and Agricultural Extension, Jimma, Ethiopia.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 Dec 23;2021:3894610. doi: 10.1155/2021/3894610. eCollection 2021.
In Ethiopia, agriculture is the principal source of food and livelihood for many rural households, making it a central component of programs that seek to reduce poverty and achieve food security. Since the sector is faced with many challenges, rural households are compelled to develop strategies through diversification to cope with the increasing vulnerability associated with agricultural production. As a result, the purpose of this research is to assess the impact of livelihood diversification on household poverty in the Jimma zone of Ethiopia's Oromia regional state. A multistage sampling procedure was employed to select 385 sample household heads. The study utilized data obtained from a cross-sectional survey using an interview schedule, focus group discussion, key informant interview, and personal observations. Both descriptive and econometric data analysis techniques were applied. The result of the FGT poverty measure revealed that the incidence of poverty among rural households was 37.14%, implying that 62.86% were non-poor. The descriptive statistics revealed that age of household, dependency ratio, year of schooling, sex of household, livestock ownership, landholding, non-farm income, market distance, and extension contact were found to have a significant influence on the poverty status of a household at different probability levels. Based on the cost of basic needs approach, it was applied to measure poverty status. The results of the logit model indicate that family size, landholding, livestock ownership, year of schooling, access to credit services, and off-farm income of the households were found to have significantly determined livelihood diversification. Moreover, the results of the propensity score matching indicate that household participation in livelihood diversification has a positive and significant impact on household poverty. Accordingly, households with diversified livelihoods were found to be 9% better off than those that were not diversified in terms of poverty. Policies aimed at increasing the income generation ability of the household should be strongly considered. Therefore, to ensure the capacity of rural households to practice farming along with a wide range of income-generating activities to improve the well-being of the rural poor and have a significant impact on poverty reduction, participating in livelihood diversification should be given emphasis in development planning.
在埃塞俄比亚,农业是许多农村家庭的主要食物和生计来源,因此是旨在减少贫困和实现粮食安全的方案的核心组成部分。由于该部门面临许多挑战,农村家庭不得不通过多样化来制定战略,以应对与农业生产相关的日益增加的脆弱性。因此,本研究旨在评估生计多样化对埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚地区吉马地区农村家庭贫困的影响。采用多阶段抽样程序选择了 385 户抽样家庭户主。该研究利用从使用访谈表、焦点小组讨论、关键知情人访谈和个人观察的横断面调查中获得的数据进行。应用了描述性和计量经济学数据分析技术。FGT 贫困衡量标准的结果表明,农村家庭的贫困发生率为 37.14%,这意味着 62.86%是非贫困人口。描述性统计结果表明,家庭年龄、抚养比、受教育年限、家庭性别、牲畜所有权、土地持有量、非农业收入、市场距离和推广联系在不同概率水平上对家庭的贫困状况有显著影响。根据基本需求成本法,应用于衡量贫困状况。Logit 模型的结果表明,家庭规模、土地持有量、牲畜所有权、受教育年限、获得信贷服务和家庭非农业收入被认为显著决定了生计多样化。此外,倾向得分匹配的结果表明,家庭参与生计多样化对家庭贫困有积极和显著的影响。因此,与没有多样化的家庭相比,生计多样化的家庭在贫困方面要好 9%。应该强烈考虑增加家庭创收能力的政策。因此,为了确保农村家庭有能力从事农业和广泛的创收活动,以改善农村贫困人口的福祉,并对减贫产生重大影响,应在发展规划中重视参与生计多样化。