Department of Physics and Chemistry, Hungarian Institute for Forensic Sciences, 9 Mosonyi Street Budapest, H-1087, Hungary.
Disaster Management Research Institute, 33 Laktanya Street Budapest, H-1033, Hungary.
Forensic Sci Int. 2022 May;334:111265. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111265. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
The comparative analysis of glasses based on refractive index (RI) is a widely used method in forensic examinations. However, it cannot be directly applied if the control sample has previously been altered by heat or fire, since RI can change significantly in this process. For this reason, the refractive index of the fragments recovered from the perpetrator's clothing can also differ from the control sample recovered after the fire, although they originate from the same source. In the present study, annealing was used as a possible way for the examination of glass microfragments exposed to heat. The appropriate conditions of annealing were investigated first. Then fragments from a toughened and a non-toughened glass were heated in a furnace for various times at 450 and 650 °C and cooled down immediately to model different heat expositions. It resulted in a significant change in the RIs in all cases. These fragments, together with the non-treated samples from the same pane of glasses, were annealed using the optimized parameters. In a similar process, further glasses exposed to real fire were examined. It was found, both in the model experiments and for the fragments exposed to fire, that - regardless of the heat exposure conditions - annealing resulted in the same RI for fragments from the same source, while for different samples different values were observed. Altogether, 11 glasses were examined in 38 experiments, and it was found that annealing combined with refractive index measurement could be a possible way for the examination of heated fragments. The changes in RIs and standard deviations observed during the experiments are consistent with literature data.
基于折射率(RI)的玻璃对比分析是法医学中广泛使用的方法。然而,如果对照样品先前受到热或火的改变,则不能直接应用,因为在此过程中 RI 会发生显着变化。出于这个原因,即使碎片源自同一来源,从犯罪者衣物上回收的碎片的折射率也可能与火灾后回收的对照样品不同。在本研究中,退火被用作检查受热暴露的玻璃微碎片的一种可能方法。首先研究了退火的适当条件。然后,将来自强化和非强化玻璃的碎片在炉中以 450 和 650°C 的不同时间加热,并立即冷却以模拟不同的热暴露。结果所有情况下 RI 都发生了显着变化。这些碎片以及来自同一窗玻璃的未经处理的样品,使用优化的参数进行了退火。以类似的过程,进一步检查了暴露在真火中的其他玻璃。在模型实验和暴露在火中的碎片中都发现,无论热暴露条件如何,退火都会导致来自同一来源的碎片具有相同的 RI,而对于不同的样品则观察到不同的值。总共在 38 个实验中检查了 11 种玻璃,发现退火与折射率测量相结合可能是检查受热碎片的一种可行方法。实验过程中观察到的 RI 和标准偏差的变化与文献数据一致。