Bhuvaneshwari Srinivasan, Singh Jyotirmay, Kandasamy Baburajan, Dash Sumit, Razi Mohammed A
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):1249-1252.
This study was done to assess peri-implant soft tissues and hard tissues in immediate and delayed titanium implants cases.
This study was conducted on 84 patients who were randomly divided into two groups. Group I was immediate implant group (42 patients) and group II was delayed implant group (42 patients). Parameters such as peri-implant esthetic score, crestal bone defect, and densitometry of peri-implant were evaluated after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
The mean peri-implant esthetic score at first week in group I was 7.4 and in group II was 5.8, at first month in group I was 6.8 and in group II was 4.6, at third month in group I was 6.7 and in group II was 4.5 and at sixth month in group I was 6.4 and in group II was 4.4. The difference was significant ( value < 0.05). The mean peri-implant crestal bone loss (mm) after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months in group I was 0.24, 0.64, 0.86, and 1.04 and in group II was 0.28, 0.70, 0.94, and 1.14, respectively. The difference was nonsignificant ( value > 0.05). The mean peri-implant bone densitometry after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months in group I was 52.4, 45.6, 42.4, and 40.2 and in group II was 64.2, 60.5, 55.2, and 47.6, respectively. The difference was significant ( value < 0.05).
Instantaneous implants exhibited enhanced esthetic and purposeful result such as healing of peri-implant bone and peri-implant soft tissues when compared to delayed implants.
Immediate implants can be used to improve esthetic and determined result in healing of peri-implant bone and peri-implant soft tissues.
本研究旨在评估即刻种植和延期种植钛种植体病例中的种植体周围软组织和硬组织情况。
本研究对84例患者进行，这些患者被随机分为两组。第一组为即刻种植组（42例患者），第二组为延期种植组（42例患者）。在术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月评估种植体周围美学评分、牙槽嵴骨缺损及种植体周围骨密度等参数。
第一组术后第1周种植体周围美学平均评分为7.4，第二组为5.8；第1个月时，第一组为6.8，第二组为4.6；第3个月时，第一组为6.7，第二组为4.5；第6个月时，第一组为6.4，第二组为4.4。差异具有统计学意义（P值<0.05）。第一组术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月种植体周围牙槽嵴骨吸收（mm）的平均值分别为0.24、0.64、0.86和1.04，第二组分别为0.28、0.70、0.94和1.14。差异无统计学意义（P值>0.05）。第一组术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月种植体周围骨密度的平均值分别为52.4、45.6、42.4和40.2，第二组分别为64.2、60.5、55.2和47.6。差异具有统计学意义（P值<0.05）。
与延期种植体相比，即刻种植体在种植体周围骨和种植体周围软组织愈合等方面表现出更好的美学效果和预期结果。
即刻种植体可用于改善种植体周围骨和种植体周围软组织愈合的美学效果并获得确切结果。
