• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维多利亚州十年公办公立家庭分娩服务:母婴结局。

Ten years of a publicly funded homebirth service in Victoria: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Western Health Partnership, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;62(5):664-673. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13518. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1111/ajo.13518
PMID:35318640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9790430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rates of homebirth in Australia remain low, at less than 0.3% of all births.

AIMS

To report maternal and neonatal outcomes of ten years of a publicly funded homebirth service, 2009-2019.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of clinical outcome data including neonatal outcomes of women who requested a homebirth at a large metropolitan health service in Victoria, Australia. The primary outcomes included: maternal outcomes (mortality, transfer to hospital, place and mode of birth, perineal status, type of third stage of labour, postpartum haemorrhage), and neonatal outcomes (mortality, Apgar score at five minutes, birthweight, breastfeeding initiation, significant morbidity, transfer to hospital).

RESULTS

Referrals for 827 women were reviewed; 633 remained eligible at 36 weeks gestation, and 473 (57%) birthed at home. Compared to women who did not, women who had a homebirth were significantly more likely to be multiparous, have a normal vaginal birth and an intact perineum, less likely to require suturing and less likely to have blood loss of more than 500 mL. Compared to infants not born at home, infants born at home were significantly less likely to require resuscitation, more likely to be of normal birthweight and exclusively receive breastmilk on discharge. There were no maternal deaths and one neonatal death of a baby born at home before the arrival of a midwife.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes for women accepted into the publicly funded homebirth program suggest appropriate triaging and case selection. A publicly funded homebirth program, with appropriate governance and clinical guidelines, appears to be a safe option for women experiencing low-risk pregnancies.

摘要

背景

澳大利亚的家庭分娩率仍然很低,不到所有分娩的 0.3%。

目的

报告一项公共资助的家庭分娩服务十年的母婴结局,2009-2019 年。

方法

对维多利亚州一家大型大都市卫生服务机构要求家庭分娩的妇女的临床结局数据进行回顾性分析,包括新生儿结局。主要结局包括:产妇结局(死亡率、转院、分娩地点和方式、会阴状况、第三产程类型、产后出血)和新生儿结局(死亡率、5 分钟时的 Apgar 评分、出生体重、开始母乳喂养、显著发病率、转院)。

结果

共审查了 827 名妇女的转介情况;在 36 周妊娠时,633 名妇女仍符合条件,其中 473 名(57%)在家中分娩。与未在家中分娩的妇女相比,在家中分娩的妇女多为经产妇、阴道分娩正常且会阴完整、需要缝合的可能性较小、出血量超过 500ml 的可能性较小。与不在家中出生的婴儿相比,在家中出生的婴儿需要复苏的可能性较小,更有可能出生体重正常,出院时只接受母乳喂养。没有产妇死亡,一名在家中分娩的新生儿在助产士到达之前死亡。

结论

被纳入公共资助家庭分娩计划的妇女的结局表明适当的分诊和病例选择。在适当的治理和临床指南下,公共资助的家庭分娩计划似乎是低风险妊娠妇女的安全选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9e2/9790430/9fe10d461de0/AJO-62-664-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9e2/9790430/9fe10d461de0/AJO-62-664-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9e2/9790430/9fe10d461de0/AJO-62-664-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ten years of a publicly funded homebirth service in Victoria: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.维多利亚州十年公办公立家庭分娩服务:母婴结局。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;62(5):664-673. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13518. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
Publicly funded homebirth in Australia: a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes over 6 years.澳大利亚公共资助的家庭分娩:6 年母婴结局回顾。
Med J Aust. 2013 Jun 17;198(11):616-20. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11665.
3
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式与针对育龄妇女的其他照护模式对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 15(9):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub4.
4
A pathway to establish a publicly funded home birth program in Australia.在澳大利亚建立一个公共资助的家庭分娩项目的途径。
Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):e420-e428. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
5
Relationships are the key to a successful publicly funded homebirth program, a qualitative study.关系是成功的公共资助家庭分娩项目的关键,一项定性研究。
Women Birth. 2023 Jul;36(4):377-384. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.12.005. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
6
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式与针对育龄妇女的其他照护模式的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.
7
Getting kicked off the program: Women's experiences of antenatal exclusion from publicly-funded homebirth in Australia.被逐出项目:澳大利亚女性在接受公共资助的家庭分娩时被产前排斥的经历。
Women Birth. 2023 Feb;36(1):e179-e185. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
8
Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚维多利亚州公立家庭分娩项目中女性的观点和经验:一项横断面调查。
Women Birth. 2019 Jun;32(3):221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000-2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data.2000-2015 年维多利亚州计划性私人家庭分娩:维多利亚围产期数据的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1996-6.
10
Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women.导乐连续性护理模式与其他产妇照护模式的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub6.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of the Woman-centred care: strategic directions for Australian maternity services (2019) national strategy with other international maternity plans.妇女为中心的护理比较:澳大利亚产科服务(2019 年)国家战略与其他国际产科计划的战略方向。
Women Birth. 2023 Feb;36(1):17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
2
Women's perceptions of inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth - A survey.妇女对公共资助的家庭分娩纳入和排除标准的看法 - 一项调查。
Women Birth. 2022 Jul;35(4):413-422. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
3
Planned homebirth in Catalonia (Spain): A descriptive study.
西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区的计划在家分娩:一项描述性研究。
Midwifery. 2021 Jul;98:102977. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102977. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for publicly-funded homebirth in Australia: A scoping review.澳大利亚公共资助家庭分娩的纳入和排除标准:范围综述。
Women Birth. 2022 Feb;35(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 - 2012: a linked population data study.2000-2012 年澳大利亚按计划分娩地点的母婴围产期结局:一项关联人群数据研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 29;9(10):e029192. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029192.
6
Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000-2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data.2000-2015 年维多利亚州计划性私人家庭分娩:维多利亚围产期数据的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1996-6.
7
Women's views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚维多利亚州公立家庭分娩项目中女性的观点和经验:一项横断面调查。
Women Birth. 2019 Jun;32(3):221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
8
Incidence, trends and severity of primary postpartum haemorrhage in Australia: A population-based study using Victorian Perinatal Data Collection data for 764 244 births.澳大利亚原发性产后出血的发病率、趋势及严重程度:一项基于人群的研究,使用维多利亚州围产期数据收集项目中764244例分娩的数据。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):228-234. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12826. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
Why do women choose an unregulated birth worker to birth at home in Australia: a qualitative study.澳大利亚女性为何选择不受监管的助产人员在家分娩:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1281-0.
10
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式与针对育龄妇女的其他照护模式的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.