Marni Sommer, Caitlin Gruer, and Margaret L. Schmitt are with the Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. Penelope A. Phillips-Howard is with the Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Angela-Maithy Nguyen is with the Interdisciplinary Division, School of Public Health, University of California‒Berkeley. Amanda Berry, Shivani Kochhar, Sarah Gorrell Kulkarni, and Denis Nash are with the Institute for Implementation Science in Population, City University of New York (CUNY), New York. Andrew R. Maroko is with the Department of Environmental, Occupational, and Geospatial Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, CUNY.
Am J Public Health. 2022 Apr;112(4):675-684. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306674.
To identify key effects of the pandemic and its economic consequences on menstrual product insecurity with implications for public health practice and policy. Study participants (n = 1496) were a subset of individuals enrolled in a national (US) prospective cohort study. Three survey waves were included (March‒October 2020). Menstrual product insecurity outcomes were explored with bivariate associations and logistic regression models to examine the associations between outcomes and income loss. Income loss was associated with most aspects of menstrual product insecurity (adjusted odds ratios from 1.34 to 3.64). The odds of not being able to afford products for those who experienced income loss was 3.64 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.14, 6.19) that of those who had no income loss and 3.95 times (95% CI = 1.78, 8.79) the odds for lower-income participants compared with higher-income participants. Pandemic-related income loss was a strong predictor of menstrual product insecurity, particularly for populations with lower income and educational attainment. Provision of free or subsidized menstrual products is needed by vulnerable populations and those most impacted by pandemic-related income loss.( 2022;112(4):675-684. (https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306674).
为了确定疫情及其对经济的影响对经期产品不安全的关键影响,以及这些影响对公共卫生实践和政策的意义。研究参与者(n=1496)是参加一项全国(美国)前瞻性队列研究的个人的一个子集。包括三个调查波(2020 年 3 月至 10 月)。使用双变量关联和逻辑回归模型探讨了经期产品不安全的结果,以检查结果与收入损失之间的关联。收入损失与经期产品不安全的大多数方面都有关联(调整后的比值比从 1.34 到 3.64)。对于那些经历了收入损失的人来说,买不起产品的可能性是那些没有收入损失的人的 3.64 倍(95%置信区间[CI] = 2.14, 6.19),对于低收入参与者来说,买不起产品的可能性是那些高收入参与者的 3.95 倍(95%CI = 1.78, 8.79)。与疫情相关的收入损失是经期产品不安全的一个强有力的预测因素,特别是对收入较低和教育程度较低的人群。脆弱人群和受疫情相关收入损失影响最大的人群需要提供免费或补贴的经期产品。(2022;112(4):675-684.(https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306674))。