文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:短期和长期结局。

TAVI in patients with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis-short-term and long-term outcomes.

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Dec;111(12):1325-1335. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02011-4. Epub 2022 Mar 23.


DOI:10.1007/s00392-022-02011-4
PMID:35320407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9681695/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to characterize different groups of low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) and determine short-term outcomes and long-term mortality according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) endpoint definitions. BACKGROUND: Characteristics and outcomes of patients with LFLG AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are poorly understood. METHODS: All patients undergoing TAVI at our center between 2013 and 2019 were screened. Patients were divided into three groups according to mean pressure gradient (dPmean), ejection fraction (LVEF), and stroke volume index (SVi): high gradient (HG) AS (dPmean ≥ 40 mmHg), classical LFLG (cLFLG) AS (dPmean < 40 mmHg, LVEF < 50%), and paradoxical LFLG (pLFLG) AS (dPmean < 40 mmHg, LVEF ≥ 50%, SVi ≤ 35 ml/m). RESULTS: We included 1776 patients (956 HG, 447 cLFLG, and 373 pLFLG patients). Most baseline characteristics differed significantly. Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was highest in cLFLG, followed by pLFLG and HG patients (5.0, 3.9 and 3.0, respectively, p < 0.01). Compared to HG patients, odds ratios for the short-term VARC-3 composite endpoints, technical failure (cLFLG, 0.76 [95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.36], pLFLG, 1.37 [0.79-2.31]) and device failure (cLFLG, 1.06 [0.74-1.49], pLFLG, 0.97 [0.66-1.41]) were similar, without relevant differences within LFLG patients. NYHA classes improved equally in all groups. Compared to HG, LFLG patients had a higher 3-year all-cause mortality (STS score-adjusted hazard ratios, cLFLG 2.16 [1.77-2.64], pLFLG 1.53 [1.22-193]), as well as cardiovascular mortality (cLFLG, 2.88 [2.15-3.84], pLFLG, 2.08 [1.50-2.87]). CONCLUSIONS: While 3-year mortality remains high after TAVI in LFLG compared to HG patients, symptoms improve in all subsets after TAVI.

摘要

目的:本研究旨在对不同类型的低流量低梯度(LFLG)主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)进行特征描述,并根据 Valve Academic Research Consortium-3(VARC-3)终点定义,确定短期结局和长期死亡率。

背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)治疗的 LFLG AS 患者的特征和结局尚不清楚。

方法:对 2013 年至 2019 年期间在我们中心接受 TAVI 的所有患者进行筛查。根据平均压力梯度(dPmean)、射血分数(LVEF)和每搏输出量指数(SVi)将患者分为三组:高梯度(HG)AS(dPmean≥40mmHg)、经典 LFLG(cLFLG)AS(dPmean<40mmHg,LVEF<50%)和矛盾性 LFLG(pLFLG)AS(dPmean<40mmHg,LVEF≥50%,SVi≤35ml/m)。

结果:共纳入 1776 例患者(956 例 HG、447 例 cLFLG 和 373 例 pLFLG 患者)。大多数基线特征差异显著。中位胸外科医生协会(STS)评分在 cLFLG 中最高,其次是 pLFLG 和 HG 患者(分别为 5.0、3.9 和 3.0,p<0.01)。与 HG 患者相比,短期 VARC-3 复合终点(技术失败,cLFLG 为 0.76(95%置信区间,0.40-1.36),pLFLG 为 1.37(0.79-2.31))和器械失败(cLFLG 为 1.06(0.74-1.49),pLFLG 为 0.97(0.66-1.41))的比值比相似,而 LFLG 患者之间无明显差异。所有组的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级均得到同等改善。与 HG 相比,LFLG 患者的 3 年全因死亡率(STS 评分调整后的风险比,cLFLG 为 2.16(1.77-2.64),pLFLG 为 1.53(1.22-193))和心血管死亡率(cLFLG 为 2.88(2.15-3.84),pLFLG 为 2.08(1.50-2.87))均较高。

结论:与 HG 患者相比,LFLG 患者在 TAVI 后 3 年的死亡率仍然较高,但所有亚组在 TAVI 后症状均得到改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/fa349bf14bf9/392_2022_2011_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/625843ddc613/392_2022_2011_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/8c7c7e7ac81c/392_2022_2011_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/88e5db4c582c/392_2022_2011_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/e54573c57910/392_2022_2011_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/995a4c38159d/392_2022_2011_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/fa349bf14bf9/392_2022_2011_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/625843ddc613/392_2022_2011_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/8c7c7e7ac81c/392_2022_2011_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/88e5db4c582c/392_2022_2011_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/e54573c57910/392_2022_2011_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/995a4c38159d/392_2022_2011_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/9681695/fa349bf14bf9/392_2022_2011_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
TAVI in patients with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis-short-term and long-term outcomes.

Clin Res Cardiol. 2022-12

[2]
Invasive hemodynamic assessments during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of patient outcomes in higher vs. lower transvalvular gradients with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Clin Res Cardiol. 2016-1

[3]
Outcome of isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with classic and paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017-3-12

[4]
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis patients.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016-3

[5]
Does the severity of low-gradient aortic stenosis classified by computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcification determine the outcome of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)?

Eur Radiol. 2021-1

[6]
Difference in cardiac response after transcatheter aortic valve implantation according to flow and gradient pattern.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024-12-31

[7]
Quantification of physical activity with prospective activity tracking after transfemoral aortic valve replacement.

Int J Cardiol. 2023-4-1

[8]
1-Year Survival After TAVR of Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient and High-Gradient Aortic Valve Stenosis in Matched Study Populations.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019-4-22

[9]
Association of atrial fibrillation with survival in patients with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction undergoing TAVI.

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024-5-22

[10]
TAVI for patients with normal-flow low-gradient compared to high-gradient aortic stenosis.

Int J Cardiol. 2023-1-15

引用本文的文献

[1]
Hemodynamic phenotypes of severe aortic stenosis in patients with small aortic annulus and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation outcomes.

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025-8-14

[2]
Less Symptom Improvement in Patients Undergoing TAVI With Concomitant COPD, Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025-9

[3]
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Very Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Struct Heart. 2025-3-17

[4]
The impact of myocardial injury on outcomes in TAVI patients.

Clin Res Cardiol. 2025-3

[5]
Long-term survival after TAVI in low-flow, low-gradient aortic valve stenosis.

EuroIntervention. 2024-11-18

[6]
Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Severe Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024-11-5

[7]
Patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis gain the least benefit from TAVI among all hemodynamic subtypes.

Clin Res Cardiol. 2024-7-2

[8]
Right ventricular dysfunction and impaired right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Eur J Heart Fail. 2024-11

[9]
Right ventricular to pulmonary artery coupling in patients with different types of aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI.

Clin Res Cardiol. 2025-2

[10]
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Improves Quality of Life and Ventricular Function With Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024-3

本文引用的文献

[1]
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.

EuroIntervention. 2022-2-4

[2]
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research.

Eur Heart J. 2021-5-14

[3]
Benefit of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Versus High-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Function.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021-3

[4]
Comparison of Early Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Management in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: Results From the TOPAS Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020-12-15

[5]
Risk of mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement for low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Clin Res Cardiol. 2021-3

[6]
Outcome of Flow-Gradient Patterns of Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement: An Analysis of the PARTNER 2 Trial and Registry.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020-7

[7]
Adaptive development of concomitant secondary mitral and tricuspid regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021-8-14

[8]
Meta-Analysis of Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Among Patients With Low Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Am J Cardiol. 2019-5-9

[9]
1-Year Survival After TAVR of Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient and High-Gradient Aortic Valve Stenosis in Matched Study Populations.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019-4-22

[10]
Hemodynamic Response in Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction After TAVR.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019-4-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索