• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者右心室功能障碍的患病率及预后意义。

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Severe Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry University of Salerno Baronissi Salerno Italy.

Interventional Cardiology Unit Pineta Grande Hospital Castel Volturno Caserta Italy.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e036239. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036239. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.036239
PMID:39494566
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11935675/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether the presence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction may influence the clinical outcome of patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not yet been established.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included consecutive patients with LFLG-AS undergoing TAVR at 2 high-volume Italian centers. RV dysfunction before TAVR procedure was defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion assessed by transthoracic echocardiography lower than <17 mm. The primary outcome was all-cause death at 1 year. The propensity score weighting technique was implemented to account for potential selection bias between patients with and without RV dysfunction. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the consistency of the results in patients with classical and paradoxical LFLG-AS forms. This study included 392 patients; of them, 97 (24.7%) patients showed RV dysfunction before TAVR. At propensity score-weighted adjusted Cox regression analysis, RV dysfunction, according to dichotomous definition, was associated with an increased risk for the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.11 [95% CI, 1.58-6.13]), cardiovascular death (adjusted HR, 3.26 [95% CI, 1.58-6.72]), and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (adjusted HR, 3.39 [95% CI, 1.76-6.53]). Conversely, no difference was detected for the risk of stroke and of permanent pacemaker implantation. No significant interaction of the classical and paradoxical LFLG-AS subgroups was detected for all the outcomes of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that RV dysfunction echocardiographically assessed by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion may improve the prognostic stratification of patients with LFLG-AS undergoing TAVR.

摘要

背景

右心室(RV)功能障碍的存在是否会影响接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄(LFLG-AS)患者的临床结局尚未确定。

方法和结果

本研究纳入了在意大利 2 家高容量中心接受 TAVR 的连续 LFLG-AS 患者。TAVR 术前 RV 功能障碍定义为经胸超声心动图评估的三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移<17mm。主要终点为 1 年全因死亡。采用倾向评分加权技术来考虑 RV 功能障碍患者和无 RV 功能障碍患者之间的潜在选择偏倚。进行了预先指定的亚组分析,以评估结果在具有经典和矛盾 LFLG-AS 形式的患者中的一致性。这项研究共纳入 392 例患者;其中 97 例(24.7%)患者在 TAVR 前出现 RV 功能障碍。在倾向评分加权调整的 Cox 回归分析中,根据二分类定义,RV 功能障碍与主要结局(调整后的危险比[HR],3.11[95%可信区间,1.58-6.13])、心血管死亡(调整后的 HR,3.26[95%可信区间,1.58-6.72])和主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(调整后的 HR,3.39[95%可信区间,1.76-6.53])的风险增加相关。相反,未检测到中风和永久性起搏器植入的风险差异。对于所有感兴趣的结局,未检测到经典和矛盾 LFLG-AS 亚组之间的显著交互作用。

结论

这项研究表明,经三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移评估的 RV 功能障碍可能改善接受 TAVR 的 LFLG-AS 患者的预后分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/11935675/aa9768d9ce15/JAH3-13-e036239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/11935675/aa183babb980/JAH3-13-e036239-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/11935675/f461a5b1f1aa/JAH3-13-e036239-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/11935675/aa9768d9ce15/JAH3-13-e036239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/11935675/aa183babb980/JAH3-13-e036239-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/11935675/f461a5b1f1aa/JAH3-13-e036239-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/11935675/aa9768d9ce15/JAH3-13-e036239-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Severe Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者右心室功能障碍的患病率及预后意义。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e036239. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036239. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后右心室功能障碍对临床结局的预测价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;12(4):577-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.12.015. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
3
Prognostic Assessment of Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction on Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Short-Term Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后右心室收缩功能障碍短期预后评估的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 16;9(12):e014463. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014463. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
4
Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者右心室收缩功能障碍的患病率及预后意义
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003486.
5
Impact of Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Tricuspid Regurgitation on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.右心室功能障碍和三尖瓣反流对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者预后的影响。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Jan;30(1):36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
6
Right ventricular dysfunction and impaired right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.矛盾性低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄中的右心室功能障碍及右心室-肺动脉耦联受损
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Nov;26(11):2340-2352. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3329. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
7
Impact of tricuspid regurgitation and right ventricular dysfunction on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.三尖瓣反流和右心室功能障碍对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Jan;42(1):206-212. doi: 10.1002/clc.23126. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
8
Outcomes and Predictors of Different Flow-Gradient Patterns of Aortic Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后主动脉瓣狭窄不同血流-梯度模式的结局与预测因素
Am J Cardiol. 2025 May 1;242:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.019. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
9
Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Artery Coupling.经导管主动脉瓣置换术对右心室-肺动脉耦联的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2145-2154. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.025.
10
Right ventricular assessment in patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换或外科主动脉瓣置换患者的右心室评估。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec;96(7):E711-E722. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28861. Epub 2020 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Impact of Mitral Regurgitation Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术前后重度低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者二尖瓣反流对预后的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e029553. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029553. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
Evolution and Prognostic Impact of Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Artery Coupling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后右心室-肺动脉耦联的演变及其对预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 10;16(13):1612-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.003.
3
TAVI in patients with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis-short-term and long-term outcomes.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:短期和长期结局。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Dec;111(12):1325-1335. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02011-4. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
4
Multi-modality imaging assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an EACVI and ESC council of valvular heart disease position paper.天然瓣膜反流的多模态成像评估:欧洲心血管影像学会(EACVI)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏瓣膜病委员会立场文件
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Apr 18;23(5):e171-e232. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab253.
5
Prevalence and Outcomes of Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis-From the National Echo Database of Australia.澳大利亚国家超声心动图数据库中低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄的患病率及结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e021126. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021126. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
6
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
7
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3:主动脉瓣临床研究更新终点定义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Comparison of Early Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Management in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: Results From the TOPAS Prospective Observational Cohort Study.采用逆概率治疗加权法比较低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的早期外科或经导管主动脉瓣置换与保守治疗:TOPAS 前瞻性观察队列研究结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec 15;9(24):e017870. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017870. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Incidence and predictors of treatment futility.矛盾性低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术:治疗无效的发生率及预测因素
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;316:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.036. Epub 2020 Apr 13.