Department of Language Studies, Umeå University, Sweden.
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Sweden.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2022 Apr 11;53(2):542-560. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00101. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
Learning new vocabulary has been identified as a challenge for students with (developmental) language disorder ((D)LD). In this study, we evaluate the effects of two active learning methods, (a) retrieval practice (RP) and (b) rich vocabulary instruction (RVI), in a group of students with (D)LD in secondary school.
A quasi-experimental counterbalanced within-subject design was used to compare and evaluate the effect of RP and RVI on learning Tier 2 vocabulary, with target and control words as dependent measures. Eleven students with (D)LD ( = 14.9 years) attending a language unit participated. RP and RVI were implemented in regular classroom activities during 16 lessons (eight lessons/instructional condition). Learning was assessed by comparing performance on a pretest session 1-2 weeks prior, with posttest performance 1 week after each instructional condition.
The learning gain for RP was superior to that for RVI, both with respect to the Bayesian probabilistic estimations for target words relative to control words and in direct comparison with RVI. Only weak evidence was found for RVI with respect to the Bayesian probabilistic estimations for target words relative to control words.
All participants showed positive learning gains following RP, whereas the outcome for RVI was more diverse. This initial work suggests that RP promotes larger learning gains relative to RVI and promotes learning across language profiles. This study extends previous studies by exploring the implementation of RP in regular classroom activities and by using more complex to-be-learned material (Tier 2 words).
学习新词汇已被确定为(发展性)语言障碍(DLD)学生的挑战。在这项研究中,我们评估了两种主动学习方法(a)检索练习(RP)和(b)丰富词汇教学(RVI)在中学 DLD 学生群体中的效果。
采用半实验对照的被试内设计,比较和评估 RP 和 RVI 对 Tier 2 词汇学习的影响,以目标词和控制词作为因变量。11 名 DLD 学生(平均年龄= 14.9 岁)参加了语言单元课程。RP 和 RVI 在 16 节课(每节 8 节课/教学条件)期间在常规课堂活动中实施。通过比较课前测试 1-2 周和每个教学条件后的课后测试的表现来评估学习。
与控制词相比,RP 的学习增益优于 RVI,这两种方法都针对目标词的贝叶斯概率估计,并且与 RVI 直接比较。仅针对目标词相对于控制词的贝叶斯概率估计,发现了针对 RVI 的微弱证据。
所有参与者在接受 RP 后都表现出积极的学习增益,而 RVI 的结果则更加多样化。这项初步工作表明,与 RVI 相比,RP 促进了更大的学习增益,并促进了不同语言模式的学习。本研究通过在常规课堂活动中探索 RP 的实施,并使用更复杂的待学习材料(Tier 2 单词),扩展了以前的研究。