• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹膜后淋巴结清扫术对最佳切除的晚期卵巢高级别浆液性癌的生存获益:一项多机构回顾性研究。

Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jul;33(4):e40. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40. Epub 2022 Feb 21.

DOI:10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40
PMID:35320889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9250859/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLNA) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remain controversial because clinical behaviors differ among subtypes. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether RLNA increases the survival rate of advanced high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 3,227 patients with EOC treated between 1986 and 2017 at 14 institutions. Among them, 335 patients with stage IIB-IV HGSC who underwent optimal cytoreduction (residual tumor of <1 cm) were included. Patients were divided into the RLNA group (n=170) and non-RLNA group (n=165). All pathological slides were assessed based on a central pathological review. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups in the original and weighted cohorts adjusted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

The median observation period was 49.8 (0.5-241.5) months. Overall, 219 (65%) out of 335 patients had recurrence or progression, while 146 (44%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, RLNA was a significant prognostic factor for longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=0.741; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.558-0.985) and overall survival (OS) (HR=0.652; 95% CI=0.459-0.927). In the weighted cohort in which all variables were well balanced as standardized differences decreased, RLNA was also a significant prognostic factor for more favorable oncologic outcomes (PFS, adjusted HR=0.742; 95% CI=0.613-0.899) and OS, adjusted HR=0.620; 95% CI=0.488-0.787).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that RLNA for stage III-IV HGSC with no residual tumor after primary debulking surgery contributed to better oncologic outcomes.

摘要

目的

腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(RLNA)对上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的生存获益仍存在争议,因为不同亚型的临床行为存在差异。本研究旨在阐明 RLNA 是否能提高晚期高级别浆液性癌(HGSC)的生存率。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列分析,纳入了 1986 年至 2017 年在 14 家机构接受治疗的 3227 名 EOC 患者。其中,335 名接受了最佳减瘤术(残余肿瘤<1cm)的 IIB-IV 期 HGSC 患者被纳入研究。患者被分为 RLNA 组(n=170)和非 RLNA 组(n=165)。所有病理切片均基于中心病理评估。在原始队列和加权队列中,通过治疗反概率加权调整后,比较两组的肿瘤学结局。

结果

中位观察期为 49.8(0.5-241.5)个月。总体而言,335 名患者中有 219 名(65%)出现复发或进展,146 名(44%)死于该病。在原始队列中,RLNA 是无复发生存期(PFS)(风险比[HR]=0.741;95%置信区间[CI]=0.558-0.985)和总生存期(OS)(HR=0.652;95% CI=0.459-0.927)更长的显著预后因素。在加权队列中,所有变量均得到很好的平衡,标准化差异降低,RLNA 也是更好的肿瘤学结局(PFS,调整 HR=0.742;95% CI=0.613-0.899)和 OS,调整 HR=0.620;95% CI=0.488-0.787)的显著预后因素。

结论

本研究表明,对于原发性减瘤术后无残留肿瘤的 III-IV 期 HGSC,进行 RLNA 有助于获得更好的肿瘤学结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a4/9250859/31efc301a80c/jgo-33-e40-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a4/9250859/eba4e69b975e/jgo-33-e40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a4/9250859/ba2b82cf71a5/jgo-33-e40-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a4/9250859/31efc301a80c/jgo-33-e40-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a4/9250859/eba4e69b975e/jgo-33-e40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a4/9250859/ba2b82cf71a5/jgo-33-e40-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a4/9250859/31efc301a80c/jgo-33-e40-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study.腹膜后淋巴结清扫术对最佳切除的晚期卵巢高级别浆液性癌的生存获益:一项多机构回顾性研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jul;33(4):e40. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
2
The impact of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy on long-term oncologic outcome of women with advanced ovarian clear-cell carcinoma.系统性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术对晚期卵巢透明细胞癌女性长期肿瘤学结局的影响。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(4):e47. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e47. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Does complete-staging lymphadenectomy improve survival outcomes in stage I endometrioid epithelial ovarian carcinoma? A multi-institutional retrospective study with propensity score-weighted analysis.完全分期淋巴结切除术是否能改善 I 期子宫内膜样上皮性卵巢癌的生存结局?一项采用倾向评分加权分析的多机构回顾性研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 3;51(3):387-392. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa206.
4
A novel classification of residual disease after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer to better distinguish oncologic outcome.一种新的晚期卵巢癌间歇肿瘤减灭术后残留病灶分类方法,可更好地区分肿瘤学结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):326.e1-326.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
Outcomes of Non-High Grade Serous Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: Single-Institution Experience.晚期卵巢癌新辅助化疗后非高级别浆液性癌的结局:单机构经验
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Oct;59(8):930-936. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.8.930.
6
Should stage IIIC ovarian cancer be further stratified by intraperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal only disease?: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.是否应仅根据腹膜内与腹膜后疾病对 IIIC 期卵巢癌进一步分层?:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jan;124(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.024. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
7
Clinical significance of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.晚期卵巢癌患者中间减瘤手术期间系统性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术的临床意义
J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Oct;26(4):303-10. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.303. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
8
Prognostic impact of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on clinically-apparent stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a multi-institutional study with propensity score-weighted analysis.盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术对临床Ⅰ期原发性黏液性上皮性卵巢癌预后的影响:一项采用倾向评分加权分析的多机构研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 17;50(2):145-151. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz163.
9
Associations between residual disease and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer by histologic type.不同组织学类型上皮性卵巢癌中残余病灶与生存的相关性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;147(2):250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Real-world study of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者淋巴结切除术的真实世界研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Apr;50(4):663-670. doi: 10.1111/jog.15900. Epub 2024 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of nomograms to forecast overall survival and cancer-specific survival in Asian patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer.预测亚洲上皮性卵巢癌患者总生存期和癌症特异性生存期的列线图的开发与验证
Front Surg. 2025 Mar 25;12:1443605. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1443605. eCollection 2025.
2
Role of lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.淋巴结清扫术在晚期卵巢癌中的作用:一项荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2024 Nov 27;11:1481625. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1481625. eCollection 2024.
3
Histology-specific long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent complete tumor resection: The implication of occult seeds after initial surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy on long-term oncologic outcome of women with advanced ovarian clear-cell carcinoma.系统性腹膜后淋巴结清扫术对晚期卵巢透明细胞癌女性长期肿瘤学结局的影响。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(4):e47. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e47. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
2
Fertility-Sparing surgery for young women with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: a multicenteric comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting.年轻卵巢子宫内膜样癌女性的保留生育功能手术:一项使用治疗权重逆概率的多中心比较研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Jun 12;4:100071. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100071. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
上皮性卵巢癌患者行完全肿瘤切除术的组织学特异性长期肿瘤学结局:初始手术后隐匿性播散的意义。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 25;19(11):e0311421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311421. eCollection 2024.
Comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes between metastatic ovarian carcinoma originating from gastrointestinal organs and advanced mucinous ovarian carcinoma.
胃肠道来源的转移性卵巢癌与高级别黏液性卵巢癌的长期肿瘤学结局比较。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug;24(8):950-956. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01438-6. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
4
A Randomized Trial of Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Neoplasms.随机对照试验在晚期卵巢肿瘤患者中的淋巴结切除术
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 28;380(9):822-832. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808424.
5
Prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy and prevalence of lymph node metastasis in clinically-apparent stage I endometrioid and mucinous ovarian carcinoma.临床Ⅰ期子宫内膜样和黏液性卵巢癌淋巴结切除术的预后意义及淋巴结转移的发生率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):414-419. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.038. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
6
The impact of lymph node dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival: A nationwide cohort study of patients with clinical early-stage ovarian cancer.淋巴结清扫术及辅助化疗对生存率的影响:一项针对临床早期卵巢癌患者的全国性队列研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Oct;66:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
7
Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.在观察性研究中,利用倾向得分采用治疗权重的逆概率(IPTW)估计因果治疗效果时,朝着最佳实践迈进。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
8
Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group.系统盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术治疗 pT1 和 pT2 卵巢癌的临床影响: Sankai 妇科研究组的回顾性调查。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec;18(6):1107-13. doi: 10.1007/s10147-012-0483-8. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
9
Is there any association between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival benefit in ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients?对于卵巢透明细胞癌患者,腹膜后淋巴结切除术与生存获益之间是否存在关联?
Ann Oncol. 2008 Jul;19(7):1284-1287. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn059. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
10
The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients.淋巴结切除术在上皮性卵巢癌中的潜在治疗作用:一项对13918例患者的研究
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jun 18;96(12):1817-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603803. Epub 2007 May 22.