• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴结切除术在上皮性卵巢癌中的潜在治疗作用:一项对13918例患者的研究

The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients.

作者信息

Chan J K, Urban R, Hu J M, Shin J Y, Husain A, Teng N N, Berek J S, Osann K, Kapp D S

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, 1600 Divisadero Street, Box 1702, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2007 Jun 18;96(12):1817-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603803. Epub 2007 May 22.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603803
PMID:17519907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2359970/
Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the role of lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program reported between 1988 and 2001. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for analysis. Of 13 918 women with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (median age: 64 years), 87.9% were Caucasian, 5.6% African Americans, and 4.4% Asians. A total of 4260 (30.6%) underwent lymph node dissections with a median number of six nodes reported. For all patients, a more extensive lymph node dissection (0, 1, 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, and >20 nodes) was associated with an improved 5-year disease-specific survival of 26.1, 35.2, 42.6, 48.4, 47.5, and 47.8%, respectively (P<0.001). Of the stage IIIC patients with nodal metastases, the extent of nodal resection (1, 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, and >20 nodes) was associated with improved survivals of 36.9, 45.0, 47.8, 48.7, and 51.1%, respectively (P=0.023). On multivariate analysis, the extent of lymph node dissection and number of positive nodes were significant independent prognosticators after adjusting for age, year at diagnosis, stage, and grade of disease. The extent of lymphadenectomy is associated with an improved disease-specific survival of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定淋巴结切除术在晚期上皮性卵巢癌中的作用。数据来源于1988年至2001年报告的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划。采用Kaplan-Meier估计法和Cox比例风险回归模型进行分析。在13918例III-IV期上皮性卵巢癌女性患者中(中位年龄:64岁),87.9%为白种人,5.6%为非裔美国人,4.4%为亚洲人。共有4260例(30.6%)患者接受了淋巴结清扫术,报告的淋巴结中位数为6个。对于所有患者,更广泛的淋巴结清扫(0、1、2-5、6-10、11-20和>20个淋巴结)分别与5年疾病特异性生存率提高26.1%、35.2%、42.6%、48.4%、47.5%和47.8%相关(P<0.001)。在有淋巴结转移的IIIC期患者中,淋巴结切除范围(1、2-5、6-10、11-20和>20个淋巴结)分别与生存率提高36.9%、45.0%、47.8%、48.7%和51.1%相关(P=0.023)。多因素分析显示,在调整年龄、诊断年份、分期和疾病分级后,淋巴结清扫范围和阳性淋巴结数量是显著的独立预后因素。淋巴结切除术的范围与晚期上皮性卵巢癌女性患者的疾病特异性生存率提高相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fef/2359970/c46389256e56/6603803f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fef/2359970/c912cabe2571/6603803f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fef/2359970/c46389256e56/6603803f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fef/2359970/c912cabe2571/6603803f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fef/2359970/c46389256e56/6603803f2.jpg

相似文献

1
The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients.淋巴结切除术在上皮性卵巢癌中的潜在治疗作用:一项对13918例患者的研究
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jun 18;96(12):1817-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603803. Epub 2007 May 22.
2
Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients.Ⅰ期卵巢癌患者淋巴结清扫与生存情况的相关性
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):12-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249610.95885.ef.
3
Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12,333 patients.淋巴结切除术在子宫内膜样子宫体癌中的治疗作用:一项对12333例患者的研究。
Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8):1823-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22185.
4
Role of lymphadenectomy in the management of grossly apparent advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer.淋巴结切除术在肉眼可见的晚期上皮性卵巢癌治疗中的作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1862-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.068.
5
Is it justified to classify patients to Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only?仅根据淋巴结受累情况将患者归类为IIIC期上皮性卵巢癌是否合理?
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec;103(3):797-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.08.047. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
6
The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.接受根治性膀胱切除术的淋巴结转移患者中淋巴结清扫范围与生存之间的关联。
Cancer. 2008 Jun;112(11):2401-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23474.
7
Significance of preoperative serum CA-125 levels in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer.术前血清CA-125水平在上皮性卵巢癌淋巴结转移预测中的意义
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1136-42. doi: 10.1080/00016340802478158.
8
Surgical management of mesenteric lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing rectosigmoid colectomy for locally advanced ovarian carcinoma.局部晚期卵巢癌患者行直肠乙状结肠切除术时肠系膜淋巴结转移的外科治疗
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(12):3552-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9565-7. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
9
The clinical significance of occult macroscopically positive retroperitoneal nodes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Jul;82(1):143-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6232.
10
The investigation of the factors affecting retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer.探讨影响 IIIC 期和 IV 期上皮性卵巢癌腹膜后淋巴结转移的因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Dec;280(6):939-44. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1038-8. Epub 2009 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of Node-RADS on MRI for a standardized assessment of lymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer.Node-RADS在MRI上对卵巢癌淋巴结转移进行标准化评估的诊断性能。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05134-0.
2
Earlier is not always better: Optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for ovarian cancer.更早并不总是更好:卵巢癌术后辅助化疗的最佳起始时间。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08095-3.
3
Proposed Nodal Cancer Index (NCI) in ovarian carcinomatosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients.Ⅰ期卵巢癌患者淋巴结清扫与生存情况的相关性
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):12-9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249610.95885.ef.
2
Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis.对宏观上局限于盆腔的上皮性卵巢癌患者进行系统性淋巴结清扫术的随机研究。
Br J Cancer. 2006 Sep 18;95(6):699-704. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603323. Epub 2006 Aug 29.
3
Cancer statistics, 2006.2006年癌症统计数据。
卵巢癌转移中拟用的淋巴结癌指数(NCI)
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2025 Apr 11;37(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s43046-025-00256-4.
4
Role of lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.淋巴结清扫术在晚期卵巢癌中的作用:一项荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2024 Nov 27;11:1481625. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1481625. eCollection 2024.
5
Improvements and challenges in intraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: The novel "tent-pitching" antegrade approach and vascular anatomical variations in the para-aortic region.腹膜内腹腔镜腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术的改进和挑战:新型“帐篷搭建”顺行入路和腹主动脉旁区域的血管解剖变异。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Sep;103(9):1753-1763. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14916. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
6
Lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancers: a meta-analysis of hazard ratios from randomized clinical trials.卵巢癌中的淋巴结切除术:随机临床试验风险比的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov 22;20(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02835-4.
7
Impact of examined lymph node number on lymph node status and prognosis in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study.检查淋巴结数量对国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IB-IIA期宫颈鳞状细胞癌淋巴结状态及预后的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;12:994105. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.994105. eCollection 2022.
8
Systematic lymph node dissection during interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.系统淋巴结清扫术在晚期上皮性卵巢癌间隔肿瘤细胞减灭术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Sep;33(5):e69. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e69. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
9
Survival benefits of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for optimally-resected advanced ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study.腹膜后淋巴结清扫术对最佳切除的晚期卵巢高级别浆液性癌的生存获益:一项多机构回顾性研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Jul;33(4):e40. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e40. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
10
Using a new diagnostic tool to predict lymph node metastasis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer leads to simple lymphadenectomy decision rules: A multicentre study from the FRANCOGYN group.采用新的诊断工具预测晚期上皮性卵巢癌的淋巴结转移可导致简单的淋巴结切除术决策规则:来自 FRANCOGYN 组的一项多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258783. eCollection 2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Mar-Apr;56(2):106-30. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.2.106.
4
Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial.系统主动脉和盆腔淋巴结清扫术与仅切除减瘤至最佳状态的晚期卵巢癌肿大淋巴结的比较:一项随机临床试验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Apr 20;97(8):560-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji102.
5
Can we rely on the size of the lymph node in determining nodal metastasis in ovarian carcinoma?我们能否依靠淋巴结大小来确定卵巢癌的淋巴结转移情况?
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 May-Jun;13(3):297-302. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13192.x.
6
Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical staging in early-stage ovarian carcinoma: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Adjuvant ChemoTherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm trial.辅助化疗和手术分期对早期卵巢癌的影响:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织-卵巢肿瘤辅助化疗试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Jan 15;95(2):113-25.
7
Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis.铂类时代最大程度肿瘤细胞减灭术对晚期卵巢癌的生存影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1248-59. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1248.
8
The clinical significance of occult macroscopically positive retroperitoneal nodes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Jul;82(1):143-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6232.
9
A critique of surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):269-74. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5926.
10
Current management of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a review.上皮性卵巢癌的当前管理:综述
Semin Surg Oncol. 2000 Jul-Aug;19(1):11-9. doi: 10.1002/1098-2388(200007/08)19:1<11::aid-ssu3>3.0.co;2-3.