Suppr超能文献

印度多价抗蛇毒血清可加速斯里兰卡锯鳞蝰蛇咬伤所致的蛇毒诱导的消耗性凝血病(VICC)的恢复。

Indian Polyvalent Antivenom Accelerates Recovery From Venom-Induced Consumption Coagulopathy (VICC) in Sri Lankan Russell's Viper () Envenoming.

作者信息

Silva Anjana, Scorgie Fiona E, Lincz Lisa F, Maduwage Kalana, Siribaddana Sisira, Isbister Geoffrey K

机构信息

Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, Sri Lanka.

Monash Venom Group, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 7;9:852651. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.852651. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC) is an important clinical consequence of Russell's viper () envenoming. There is limited evidence for antivenom effectiveness in resolving VICC. We aimed to compare the recovery of VICC in patients who received and did not receive antivenom following Russell's viper envenoming.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a non-randomized observational study comparing patients with VICC from Russell's viper envenoming given antivenom for systemic envenoming and those not given antivenom. Antivenom administration was decided by the treating physicians. We included 44 patients with confirmed Russell's viper bites with one or more International Normalized Ratio (INR) value ≥ 1.5 (VICC). We compared five patients who did not receive antivenom with 39 patients who did receive antivenom. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an INR < 1.5 by 48 h post-bite.

RESULTS

The antivenom group had higher peak serum venom concentrations [median (IQR) = 272 (96-1,076) ng/mL versus 21 (8-58) ng/mL] and more severe VICC compared to the no antivenom group. Twenty seven of 39 patients (69%) in the antivenom group had an INR < 1.5 at 48 h post-bite compared to none of the five patients (0%) in the no antivenom group (absolute difference: 69%; 95%CI: 13 to 83%; = 0.006; Fisher's exact test). The fibrinogen recovered in 32 of 39 patients (82%) in the antivenom group compared to one of five patients (20%) in the no antivenom group (absolute difference 62%; 95% CI: 28 to 95%; = 0.001; Fisher's exact test). Both INR and fibrinogen were significantly improved between 24 and 48 h post-bite in the antivenom group compared to the no antivenom group.

CONCLUSION

Antivenom accelerated the recovery of VICC in patients with Russell's viper envenoming, compared to no recovery in a smaller group of patients with milder VICC not receiving antivenom. This supports the efficacy of antivenom in patients with VICC.

摘要

背景

蛇毒诱导的消耗性凝血病(VICC)是罗素蝰蛇咬伤的重要临床后果。抗蛇毒血清在解决VICC方面的有效性证据有限。我们旨在比较接受和未接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的罗素蝰蛇咬伤患者VICC的恢复情况。

患者与方法

这是一项非随机观察性研究,比较了因全身性中毒接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的罗素蝰蛇咬伤导致VICC的患者和未接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的患者。抗蛇毒血清的使用由治疗医生决定。我们纳入了44例确诊为罗素蝰蛇咬伤且国际标准化比值(INR)≥1.5(VICC)的患者。我们将5例未接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的患者与39例接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的患者进行了比较。主要结局是咬伤后48小时内INR<1.5的患者比例。

结果

与未接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的组相比,接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的组血清毒液峰值浓度更高[中位数(四分位间距)=272(96 - 1076)ng/mL对21(8 - 58)ng/mL],VICC更严重。接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的组中39例患者中有27例(69%)在咬伤后48小时INR<1.5,而未接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的组中5例患者均无(0%)(绝对差异:69%;95%可信区间:13%至83%;P = 0.006;Fisher精确检验)。接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的组中39例患者中有32例(82%)纤维蛋白原恢复,而未接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的组中5例患者中有1例(20%)恢复(绝对差异62%;95%可信区间:28%至95%;P = 0.001;Fisher精确检验)。与未接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的组相比,接受抗蛇毒血清治疗的组在咬伤后24至48小时INR和纤维蛋白原均有显著改善。

结论

与一小部分未接受抗蛇毒血清治疗、VICC较轻且未恢复的患者相比,抗蛇毒血清加速了罗素蝰蛇咬伤患者VICC的恢复。这支持了抗蛇毒血清对VICC患者的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f980/8934852/67f52ac57cee/fmed-09-852651-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验