• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲卫生技术评估网络联合行动 3 中的药物产品早期对话:过去做了什么,未来的方向是什么。

Early Dialogues for Pharmaceutical Products in European Network for Health Technology Assessment Joint Action 3: What Was Done and Where to Go in the Future.

机构信息

Division for Assessment and Access to Innovation (DEAI), International Coordination Unit, French National Authority for Health, Saint-Denis, France.

French National Authority for Health, La Plaine, Saint-Denis, France.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Mar 24;38(1):e30. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000083.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462322000083
PMID:35321768
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to describe the process, results, and experiences of European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3's (JA3) Early Dialogue (ED) activities and to highlight opportunities for improving the processes.

METHODS

A descriptive analysis of the steps of the EUnetHTA ED process and evaluation of the data from the EDs conducted by EU health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, published guidelines, and documents, as well as internal statistics.

RESULTS

In JA3, an Early Dialogues Working Party (EDWP) was established, responsible for developing and improving processes and providing advice to pharmaceutical companies, supported by the ED Secretariat. From June 2017 to May 2021, 113 requests for pharmaceutical EDs were received and 38 conducted. The process was continuously optimized, and different approaches for involving patients were tested. Finally, a centralized procedure was chosen with the key documents produced by two responsible agencies and reviewed by the EDWP. Patient involvement was primarily done by interviewing a national patient representative to obtain general feedback on the disease and the planned study design.

CONCLUSIONS

During JA3, EDs were established as an efficient, successful product. Pharmaceutical companies benefited not only from the positions of the individual agencies for the national HTA, but also from the recommendations that were common to all HTA authorities. In addition, regarding the European HTA Regulation, it will be important to conduct Joint Scientific Consultations with a view toward future Joint Clinical Assessments and to further develop processes aligned with the high demand for consultation.

摘要

目的

本文旨在描述欧洲卫生技术评估网络(EUnetHTA)联合行动 3(JA3)早期对话(ED)活动的过程、结果和经验,并强调改进流程的机会。

方法

对 EUnetHTA ED 流程的步骤进行描述性分析,并对欧盟卫生技术评估(HTA)机构进行的 ED 数据、已发布的指南和文件以及内部统计数据进行评估。

结果

在 JA3 中,成立了一个早期对话工作组(EDWP),负责开发和改进流程,并为制药公司提供建议,由 ED 秘书处提供支持。从 2017 年 6 月到 2021 年 5 月,共收到 113 份制药 ED 请求,并进行了 38 项。该流程不断得到优化,并测试了不同的方法来让患者参与。最终,选择了一种集中式程序,由两个负责机构制作关键文件,并由 EDWP 进行审查。患者参与主要是通过采访一位国家患者代表来获得对疾病和计划研究设计的一般性反馈。

结论

在 JA3 期间,ED 作为一种高效、成功的产品得以建立。制药公司不仅受益于各个国家 HTA 机构的立场,还受益于所有 HTA 机构的共同建议。此外,根据欧洲 HTA 法规,与未来的联合临床评估相比,进行联合科学咨询将非常重要,并且需要进一步开发与咨询高需求相匹配的流程。

相似文献

1
Early Dialogues for Pharmaceutical Products in European Network for Health Technology Assessment Joint Action 3: What Was Done and Where to Go in the Future.欧洲卫生技术评估网络联合行动 3 中的药物产品早期对话:过去做了什么,未来的方向是什么。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Mar 24;38(1):e30. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000083.
2
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.医疗设备的卫生技术评估:有何不同?三个欧洲项目概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
3
Building a model of health technology assessment cooperation: lessons learned from EUnetHTA joint action 3.构建卫生技术评估合作模型:欧盟网络卫生技术评估联合行动 3 的经验教训。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jan 28;38(1):e14. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321001719.
4
Review of Relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) of pharmaceuticals at the European network for health technology assessment (EUnetHTA): A first step towards a consolidated European perspective on comparative effectiveness & safety?药品相对效果评估(REAs)在欧洲卫生技术评估网络(EUnetHTA)中的评价:迈向比较有效性和安全性的欧洲统一视角的第一步?
Health Policy. 2020 Sep;124(9):943-951. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
5
European network for Health Technology Assessment Joint Action (EUnetHTA JA): a process evaluation performed by questionnaires and documentary analysis.欧洲卫生技术评估网络联合行动(EUnetHTA JA):通过问卷调查和文献分析进行的过程评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jun;18(37):1-296. doi: 10.3310/hta18370.
6
EUnetHTA relative effectiveness assessments: efforts to increase usability, transparency and inclusiveness.欧盟卫生技术评估网络(EUnetHTA)的相对疗效评估:提高实用性、透明度和包容性的努力。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 May 26;38(1):e41. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000058.
7
An Inclusive Civil Society Dialogue for Successful Implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: Call to Action to Ensure Appropriate Involvement of Stakeholders and Collaborators.为成功实施欧盟卫生技术评估法规开展包容性公民社会对话:呼吁采取行动确保利益相关者和合作伙伴的适当参与。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Mar 14;12(1):21-34. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12010004. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
[European Collaboration in Medical Device Assessment: One Step Towards Cross-Border Health Care].[欧洲医疗器械评估合作:迈向跨境医疗保健的一步]
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Mar;80(3):210-216. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-109859. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
9
[HTA goes Europe: European collaboration on joint assessment and methodological issues becomes reality].[卫生技术评估走向欧洲:欧洲在联合评估及方法学问题上的合作成为现实]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):291-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
Stakeholder perspectives on cooperation in the clinical and nonclinical health technology assessment domains.利益相关者对临床和非临床卫生技术评估领域合作的看法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 May 22;39(1):e29. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000077.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of the early dialogue frameworks used within health technology assessment and their actual adoption from HTA agencies.健康技术评估中早期对话框架的系统评价及其在 HTA 机构中的实际采用情况。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;10:942230. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.942230. eCollection 2022.