Department of Endosurgery, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;62(4):553-559. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13510. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated alterations in provision of health care and how patients access it. Telehealth has replaced traditional face-to-face outpatient clinics in an unprecedented manner. This study aimed to assess overall patient and clinician satisfaction with telehealth consultations, to establish acceptability of telehealth during pandemic and non-pandemic times, and document feedback.
A prospective observational study involving women presenting to a general gynaecology outpatient department was performed. Women who attended for consultation between 13 July and 4 September 2020 were invited to participate in a questionnaire following their telehealth appointment. Clinicians consulting in the outpatient department were invited to complete a questionnaire at the end of the eight-week study period. Satisfaction, utility and acceptability data were obtained using visual analogue scales (VAS).
Twenty-six out of 56 (46.4%) clinicians and 124/870 (14.3%) patients completed the questionnaire. Patients who responded were older and more likely to have been born in Australia than women who did not (P = 0.0355 and P = 0.005, respectively). Overall patient satisfaction with telehealth was high (median VAS (interquartile range), 8.6 (5.6-9.8)). More women found telehealth to be acceptable during a pandemic than afterward (8.9 vs 6.6, P < 0.0001). Clinicians were less satisfied with telehealth than patients (7.1 vs 8.6, P = 0.02); however, most would be happy to continue using telehealth in non-pandemic times (7.0 (6.2-9.8)).
Telehealth consultations allow provision of gynaecological care at a time when reducing risk of infection to patients and staff is paramount. Telehealth gynaecology consultations are efficient and convenient without significant detriment to patient or clinician satisfaction.
COVID-19 大流行使得医疗保健的提供方式和患者获取医疗保健的方式发生了改变。远程医疗以前所未有的方式取代了传统的面对面门诊。本研究旨在评估患者和临床医生对远程医疗咨询的总体满意度,确定在大流行和非大流行期间远程医疗的可接受性,并记录反馈。
进行了一项涉及普通妇科门诊就诊女性的前瞻性观察研究。邀请 2020 年 7 月 13 日至 9 月 4 日期间进行远程医疗预约的女性在就诊后填写一份调查问卷。在为期八周的研究结束时,邀请在门诊就诊的临床医生填写一份调查问卷。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)获得满意度、实用性和可接受性数据。
26 名临床医生中的 26 名(46.4%)和 870 名患者中的 124 名(14.3%)完成了问卷。回答问卷的患者年龄较大,且更有可能出生在澳大利亚(P=0.0355 和 P=0.005)。患者对远程医疗的总体满意度较高(中位数 VAS(四分位距),8.6(5.6-9.8))。与大流行后相比,更多的女性认为远程医疗在大流行期间更可接受(8.9 对 6.6,P<0.0001)。临床医生对远程医疗的满意度低于患者(7.1 对 8.6,P=0.02);然而,大多数临床医生在非大流行期间愿意继续使用远程医疗(7.0(6.2-9.8))。
远程医疗咨询允许在减少患者和工作人员感染风险至关重要的时候提供妇科护理。远程医疗妇科咨询效率高,方便快捷,不会对患者或临床医生的满意度造成重大影响。