García-Montero María, Felipe-Márquez Gema, Arriola-Villalobos Pedro, Garzón Nuria
Optometry and Vision Department, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28037 Madrid, Spain.
Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Vision (Basel). 2022 Mar 4;6(1):17. doi: 10.3390/vision6010017.
This review has identified evidence about pseudomyopia as the result of an increase in ocular refractive power due to an overstimulation of the eye's accommodative mechanism. It cannot be confused with the term "secondary myopia", which includes transient myopic shifts caused by lenticular refractive index changes and myopia associated with systemic syndromes. The aim was to synthesize the literature on qualitative evidence about pseudomyopia in terms that clarify its pathophysiology, clinical presentation, assessment and diagnosis and treatment. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and the Scopus database was carried out for articles published up to November 2021, without a data limit. This review was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 54 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. The terms pseudomyopia and accommodation spasm have been found in most of the studies reviewed. The review has warned that although there is agreement on the assessment and diagnosis of the condition, there is no consensus on its management, and the literature describes a range of treatment.
本综述已确定了有关假性近视的证据,其是由于眼睛调节机制过度刺激导致眼屈光力增加的结果。它不能与“继发性近视”一词相混淆,继发性近视包括由晶状体折射率变化引起的短暂性近视偏移以及与全身综合征相关的近视。目的是以阐明其病理生理学、临床表现、评估、诊断和治疗的术语,综合关于假性近视的定性证据的文献。对PubMed和Scopus数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以查找截至2021年11月发表的文章,无数据限制。本综述按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行报告。根据纳入和排除标准,共有54项研究纳入定性综合分析。在所审查的大多数研究中都发现了假性近视和调节痉挛这两个术语。该综述警告称,尽管在该病症的评估和诊断方面存在共识,但在其管理方面尚无共识,并且文献中描述了一系列治疗方法。