Hsu Ting-Yu, Wang Pei-Ming, Chuang Po-Chun, Lin Yan-Ren, Syue Yuan-Jhen, Tsai Tsung-Cheng, Li Chao-Jui
Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Department of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 25;10(3):434. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030434.
(1) Background: It has been hypothesized that a discrepancy exists in the understanding of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order among physicians. We hypothesized that a DNR order signed in the emergency department (ED) could influence the patients’ prognosis after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. (2) Methods: We included patients older than 17 years, who visited the emergency department for non-traumatic disease, who had respiratory failure, required ventilator support, and were admitted to the ICU between January 2010 and December 2016. The associations between DNR and mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and medical fees were analyzed. Prolonged hospital LOS was defined as hospital stay ≥75th percentile (≥26 days for the study). Patients were classified as those who did and did not sign a DNR order. A 1:4 propensity score matching was conducted for demographics, comorbidities, and etiology. (3) Results: The study enrolled a total of 1510 patients who signed a DNR and 6040 patients who did not sign a DNR. The 30-day mortality rates were 47.4% and 28.0% among patients who did and did not sign a DNR, respectively. A DNR order was associated with mortality after adjusting for confounding factors (hazard ratio, 1.9; confidence interval, 1.70−2.03). It was also a risk factor for prolonged hospital LOS in survivors (odds ratio, 1.2; confidence interval, 1.02−1.44). Survivors who signed a DNR order were charged higher medical fees than those who did not sign a DNR (217,159 vs. 245,795 New Taiwan Dollars, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: Signing a DNR order in the ED increased the ICU mortality rate among patients who had respiratory failure and needed ventilator support. It increased the risk of prolonged hospital LOS among survivors. Finally, signing a DNR order was associated with high medical fees among survivors.
(1) 背景:据推测,医生对“不要复苏”(DNR)医嘱的理解存在差异。我们假设在急诊科签署的DNR医嘱可能会影响患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)后的预后。(2) 方法:我们纳入了2010年1月至2016年12月期间因非创伤性疾病就诊于急诊科、出现呼吸衰竭、需要呼吸机支持并入住ICU的17岁以上患者。分析了DNR与死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和医疗费用之间的关联。延长的住院LOS定义为住院时间≥第75百分位数(本研究中≥26天)。患者分为签署和未签署DNR医嘱的两组。对人口统计学、合并症和病因进行了1:4倾向评分匹配。(3) 结果:该研究共纳入了1510名签署DNR的患者和6040名未签署DNR的患者。签署和未签署DNR的患者30天死亡率分别为47.4%和28.0%。在调整混杂因素后,DNR医嘱与死亡率相关(风险比,1.9;置信区间,1.70 - 到2.03)。它也是幸存者延长住院LOS的危险因素(优势比,1.2;置信区间,1.02 - 到1.44)。签署DNR医嘱的幸存者比未签署DNR的幸存者支付更高的医疗费用(新台币217,159元对245,795元,p < 0.001)。(4) 结论:在急诊科签署DNR医嘱会增加呼吸衰竭且需要呼吸机支持患者的ICU死亡率。它增加了幸存者延长住院LOS的风险。最后,签署DNR医嘱与幸存者的高医疗费用相关。