• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄胎合并活胎:管理难题。近期回顾(1965 - 1985年)及2例新病例报告。

Hydatidiform mole coexisting with a live fetus: a dilemma of management. A recent review (1965-1985) and report of 2 new cases.

作者信息

Khoo S K, Monks P L, Davies N T

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 May;26(2):129-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1986.tb01548.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828x.1986.tb01548.x
PMID:3533033
Abstract

A review of 24 patients with a molar placenta and coexisting live fetus, including 2 new cases from the Queensland Trophoblastic Disease Registry, was made. The rate of fetal abnormalities was 33%; all 8 abnormal fetuses were female and in 5 of them in whom cultures were performed the chromosomal karyotype was triploidy 69XXX. There were 3 patients in whom malignant sequelae were detected (12%). After a confident ultrasound diagnosis of a molar placenta and a coexisting live fetus, the decision on whether the pregnancy should be terminated or allowed to continue should be based on the likelihood of the fetus being abnormal. It is recommended that the chromosomal karyotype and amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein level be determined by amniocentesis at about 16-18 weeks. This should allow those pregnancies in whom the fetus is potentially normal to be selected for conservative management.

摘要

对24例存在葡萄胎胎盘且有存活胎儿的患者进行了回顾性研究,其中包括昆士兰滋养细胞疾病登记处的2例新病例。胎儿异常率为33%;所有8例异常胎儿均为女性,其中5例进行了染色体核型分析,核型为69XXX三倍体。有3例患者检测到恶性后遗症(12%)。在通过超声确诊为葡萄胎胎盘且有存活胎儿后,关于是否终止妊娠或继续妊娠的决定应基于胎儿异常的可能性。建议在孕16 - 18周左右通过羊膜穿刺术确定染色体核型和羊水甲胎蛋白水平。这将有助于筛选出胎儿可能正常的妊娠进行保守治疗。

相似文献

1
Hydatidiform mole coexisting with a live fetus: a dilemma of management. A recent review (1965-1985) and report of 2 new cases.葡萄胎合并活胎:管理难题。近期回顾(1965 - 1985年)及2例新病例报告。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 May;26(2):129-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1986.tb01548.x.
2
Diploid karyotype partial mole coexisting with live term fetus--case report and review of the world literature.二倍体核型部分性葡萄胎与足月活胎共存——病例报告及世界文献复习
Ginekol Pol. 2012 Oct;83(10):789-91.
3
Clinical management and diagnostic possibilities in hydatidiform mole with coexistent fetus.
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1991 Sep;46(9):577-88. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199109000-00001.
4
Partial mole, triploidy and proteinuric hypertension: two case reports.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 May;40(2):215-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb01152.x.
5
Twin pregnancies with complete hydatidiform mole and coexisting fetus: use of fluorescent in situ hybridization to evaluate placental X- and Y-chromosomal content.
Hum Pathol. 1995 Nov;26(11):1175-80. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90189-2.
6
Individualistic approach to the management of complete hydatidiform mole with coexisting live fetus.对合并存活胎儿的完全性葡萄胎进行个体化管理的方法。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Aug;191:39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 May 30.
7
Sonographic diagnosis of a pregnancy with a diffuse hydatidiform mole and coexistent 46,XX fetus: a case report.
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Sep;72(3 Pt 2):485-8.
8
Evaluation of the risk of persistent trophoblastic disease after twin pregnancy with diploid hydatidiform mole and coexisting normal fetus.双胎妊娠合并二倍体葡萄胎及并存正常胎儿后持续性滋养细胞疾病风险的评估
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;197(1):45.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.038.
9
Twin pregnancy with a complete hydatidiform mole and surviving co-existent fetus.双胎妊娠,其中一胎为完全性葡萄胎,另一存活胎儿并存。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Oct;278(4):377-82. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0591-x. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
10
Complete mole coexistent with a twin fetus.完全性葡萄胎与双胎胎儿并存。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006 Dec;32(6):593-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00463.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Twin pregnancy with a fetus and a complete hydatidiform mole.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1996;259(1):41-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02505307.