Cantinotti Massimiliano, Marchese Pietro, Giordano Raffaele, Franchi Eliana, Assanta Nadia, Koestenberger Martin, Jani Vivek, Duignan Sophie, Kutty Shelby, McMahon Colin Joseph
Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, Massa, Pisa, Italy.
Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy.
Heart Fail Rev. 2023 Jan;28(1):63-76. doi: 10.1007/s10741-022-10230-0. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
The aim of this review is to highlight the strengths and limitations of major echocardiographic biventricular repair (BVR) prediction models for borderline left ventricle (LV) in complex congenital heart disease (CHD). A systematic search in the National Library of Medicine for Medical Subject Headings and free text terms including echocardiography, CHD, and scores, was performed. The search was refined by adding keywords for critical aortic stenosis (AS), borderline LV, complex left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, hypoplastic left heart syndrome/complex (HLHS/HLHC), and unbalanced atrio-ventricular septal defects (uAVSD). Fifteen studies were selected for the final analysis. We outlined what echocardiographic scores for different types of complex CHD with diminutive LV are available. Scores for CHD with LVOT obstruction including critical AS, HLHS/HLHC, and aortic arch hypoplasia have been validated and implemented by several studies. Scores for uAVSD with right ventricle (RV) dominance have also been established and implemented, the first being the atrioventricular valve index (AVVI). In addition to AVII, both LV/RV inflow angle and LV inflow index have all been validated for the prediction of BVR. We conclude with a discussion of limitations in the development and validation of each of these scores, including retrospective design during score development, heterogeneity in echocardiographic parameters evaluated, variability in the definition of outcomes, differences in adopted surgical and Interventional strategies, and institutional differences. Furthermore, scores developed in the past two decades may have little clinical relevance now. In summary, we provide a review of echocardiographic scores for BVR in complex CHD with a diminutive LV that may serve as a guide for use in modern clinical practice.
本综述的目的是强调用于复杂先天性心脏病(CHD)中临界左心室(LV)的主要超声心动图双心室修复(BVR)预测模型的优势和局限性。我们在美国国立医学图书馆进行了系统检索,使用了医学主题词和自由文本词,包括超声心动图、CHD和评分。通过添加关键词“严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)”“临界LV”“复杂左心室流出道(LVOT)梗阻”“左心发育不全综合征/复杂性(HLHS/HLHC)”和“不平衡房室间隔缺损(uAVSD)”对检索进行了细化。最终分析选取了15项研究。我们概述了针对不同类型左心室较小的复杂CHD有哪些可用的超声心动图评分。多项研究已验证并应用了针对伴有LVOT梗阻的CHD的评分,包括严重AS、HLHS/HLHC和主动脉弓发育不全。针对右心室(RV)优势的uAVSD的评分也已确立并应用,首个是房室瓣指数(AVVI)。除了AVII,LV/RV流入角和LV流入指数均已被验证可用于预测BVR。我们最后讨论了这些评分在开发和验证过程中的局限性,包括评分开发期间的回顾性设计、所评估的超声心动图参数的异质性、结局定义的变异性、所采用的手术和介入策略的差异以及机构差异。此外,过去二十年开发的评分现在可能几乎没有临床相关性。总之,我们对左心室较小的复杂CHD中BVR的超声心动图评分进行了综述,可为现代临床实践提供指导。