Ginjaume M, Casey M, Barker F, Duffy G
Clin Nucl Med. 1986 Sep;11(9):647-50. doi: 10.1097/00003072-198609000-00013.
Numerous centers perform glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements on patients undergoing renal imaging with Tc-99m DTPA. GFR measurement, however, does involve multiple blood samples taken over a 4-hour period, and this has led to attempts to simplify the technique by reducing the number of blood samples required and hence diminish the time taken to perform the test and the inconvenience to the patient. Four different simplified techniques for measuring GFR that have been reported in the literature are compared with a reference 2 blood sample method. Three of the methods do not require any blood samples but have standard errors of greater than 20 ml/min in adults and greater than 14 ml/min in children. The other method requires one blood sample, and if this is taken at 2 hours postinjection, the standard error is 9 ml/min in adults and 5 ml/min in children. The latter method is suitable for routine use in renography when accuracy is not of paramount importance.
许多中心都对接受锝-99m二乙三胺五乙酸(Tc-99m DTPA)肾显像的患者进行肾小球滤过率(GFR)测量。然而,GFR测量确实需要在4小时内采集多份血样,这促使人们试图通过减少所需血样数量来简化该技术,从而减少检测所需时间以及给患者带来的不便。将文献中报道的四种不同的简化GFR测量技术与一种参考的双血样方法进行了比较。其中三种方法不需要采集任何血样,但在成人中的标准误差大于20 ml/min,在儿童中大于14 ml/min。另一种方法需要采集一份血样,如果在注射后2小时采集,成人的标准误差为9 ml/min,儿童为5 ml/min。后一种方法适用于肾图检查的常规应用,前提是准确性并非至关重要。