Suppr超能文献

使用锝-99m二乙三胺五乙酸(DTPA)测量肾小球滤过率的四种简单方法之间的比较。

A comparison between four simple methods for measuring glomerular filtration rate using technetium-99m DTPA.

作者信息

Ginjaume M, Casey M, Barker F, Duffy G

出版信息

Clin Nucl Med. 1986 Sep;11(9):647-50. doi: 10.1097/00003072-198609000-00013.

Abstract

Numerous centers perform glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements on patients undergoing renal imaging with Tc-99m DTPA. GFR measurement, however, does involve multiple blood samples taken over a 4-hour period, and this has led to attempts to simplify the technique by reducing the number of blood samples required and hence diminish the time taken to perform the test and the inconvenience to the patient. Four different simplified techniques for measuring GFR that have been reported in the literature are compared with a reference 2 blood sample method. Three of the methods do not require any blood samples but have standard errors of greater than 20 ml/min in adults and greater than 14 ml/min in children. The other method requires one blood sample, and if this is taken at 2 hours postinjection, the standard error is 9 ml/min in adults and 5 ml/min in children. The latter method is suitable for routine use in renography when accuracy is not of paramount importance.

摘要

许多中心都对接受锝-99m二乙三胺五乙酸(Tc-99m DTPA)肾显像的患者进行肾小球滤过率(GFR)测量。然而,GFR测量确实需要在4小时内采集多份血样,这促使人们试图通过减少所需血样数量来简化该技术,从而减少检测所需时间以及给患者带来的不便。将文献中报道的四种不同的简化GFR测量技术与一种参考的双血样方法进行了比较。其中三种方法不需要采集任何血样,但在成人中的标准误差大于20 ml/min,在儿童中大于14 ml/min。另一种方法需要采集一份血样,如果在注射后2小时采集,成人的标准误差为9 ml/min,儿童为5 ml/min。后一种方法适用于肾图检查的常规应用,前提是准确性并非至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验