Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Drs Costich, Quesinberry, and Vos); Kentucky Injury Prevention & Research Center, Lexington (Drs Costich and Quesinberry).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(3):258-263. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001464.
Injury surveillance relies on data coded for administrative rather than epidemiological accuracy. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the 5-year Surveillance Quality Improvement (SQI) initiative to advance consensus and methodology for injury epidemiology reporting and analysis. Evaluation of the positive predictive value of the CDC's injury surveillance definitions based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coding in designated injury categories comprised much of the SQI initiative's work. The goal of the current study is to identify achievements and challenges in SQI as articulated by experienced injury epidemiology practitioners who participated in the CDC-funded SQI initiative.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 12 representatives of state and federal public health agencies who had participated extensively in the SQI initiative. The interviews were transcribed and coded using NVivo qualitative analysis software. Initial coding of the data involved both in vivo coding (using the words of participants) and coding of a priori themes.
Qualitative analysis identified 2 overarching themes, variability among states and observations on the science of injury surveillance.
Within the 2 broad themes, the respondents provided valuable insights regarding access to medical records, case definition validation, unique contributions of medical record abstracting, variations in the practice of medical coding, and the potential for use of data from medical record reviews in other injury-related areas.
The contributions of the SQI initiative have provided valuable insights into ICD-10-CM case definitions for national injury surveillance. Challenges remain with regard to data access and quality with ongoing reliance on administrative datasets for injury surveillance.
伤害监测依赖于为行政目的而非流行病学准确性而编码的数据。疾病预防控制中心 (CDC) 开展了为期 5 年的监测质量改进 (SQI) 计划,旨在推进伤害流行病学报告和分析的共识和方法。评估 CDC 伤害监测定义的阳性预测值,该定义基于国际疾病分类,第九修订版,临床修正版(ICD-9-CM)和国际疾病分类,第十修订版,临床修正版(ICD-10-CM)在指定伤害类别中的编码,是 SQI 计划的主要工作内容。本研究的目的是确定参与 CDC 资助的 SQI 计划的有经验的伤害流行病学从业者所阐述的 SQI 的成就和挑战。
设计、设置和参与者:我们对 12 名州和联邦公共卫生机构代表进行了半结构化访谈,这些代表广泛参与了 SQI 计划。访谈记录进行转录和 NVivo 定性分析软件编码。数据的初始编码涉及体内编码(使用参与者的话)和预先确定主题的编码。
定性分析确定了 2 个总体主题,即各州之间的差异和对伤害监测科学的观察。
在这 2 个广泛的主题中,受访者就医疗记录的获取、病例定义验证、医疗记录摘要的独特贡献、医疗编码实践的差异以及医疗记录审查数据在其他伤害相关领域的潜在用途提供了有价值的见解。
SQI 计划的贡献为国家伤害监测的 ICD-10-CM 病例定义提供了宝贵的见解。在伤害监测中仍然存在数据获取和质量方面的挑战,需要继续依赖行政数据集。