Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Hipokrata St. 2, LV-1038 Riga, Latvia.
Vidzeme Hospital, Jumaras St. 195, LV-4201 Valmiera, Latvia.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 2;58(3):370. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030370.
Background and Objectives: Management of infectious diseases is a huge burden to every healthcare system worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance, including antibacterial resistance, is an increasing problem worldwide; therefore, more new antibiotics are necessary to be discovered. Meanwhile, “old” antibacterial agents are still administered to fight infectious diseases caused by resistant bacteria. One of these antibacterial agents is vancomycin, which is effective in treating serious systemic infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Thus, it is necessary to perform vancomycin concentration measurements in plasma due to its narrow therapeutic index. Various approaches are implemented for more precise therapy, including therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin and with a supervision of a clinical pharmacist. The purpose of the study was to investigate if the TDM practice is improved with a local vancomycin TDM protocol applied in a hospital. The results of TDM in two multidisciplinary hospitals, one with a local TDM protocol implemented and applied and the other with no local TDM protocol implemented and applied, were compared. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed in two multidisciplinary hospitals in Latvia. The data were collected for a time period of 4 years (2016−2020) in a hospital without a local TDM protocol and for a time period of 2 years (2018−2020) in a hospital with a local TDM protocol, starting with a period of time when the vancomycin TDM protocol was developed. The data about the patients included in the study were analyzed based on gender, age, body weight, and renal function. Vancomycin therapy was analyzed based on dosing schemes (vancomycin dose and dosing interval), data about loading and maintenance doses, vancomycin concentration, and details about vancomycin concentration (sampling time and concentration level). Results: Differences between the hospitals were found in terms of the initiation of vancomycin administration and concentration sampling. In the hospital with a TDM protocol compared with the hospital without a TDM protocol, more accurate initiation was found, alongside adaption of therapy (97.22% vs. 18.95%, p < 0.001), better performance of administration of a loading dose (22.73% vs. 1.29%, p < 0.01), and reaching of target concentration (55.56% vs. 35.29%, p < 0.01). Concentration sampling in the correct timeframe before the vancomycin dose and vancomycin administration did not show statistically better results in either of the hospitals (4.60% vs. 6.29%, p = 0.786). Conclusions: Better results of adequate adjustments of vancomycin therapy were achieved in the hospital with a TDM protocol. In the long term, sustainable results and regular medical professionals’ training is necessary.
传染病的管理是全球每个医疗体系的巨大负担。抗菌药物耐药性,包括抗细菌耐药性,是全球日益严重的问题;因此,需要发现更多的新抗生素。同时,“旧”的抗菌药物仍被用于治疗由耐药菌引起的感染性疾病。其中一种抗菌药物是万古霉素,它对治疗由革兰氏阳性菌引起的严重全身感染非常有效。因此,由于其治疗指数狭窄,有必要在血浆中进行万古霉素浓度测量。为了更精确的治疗,实施了各种方法,包括万古霉素的治疗药物监测(TDM)和临床药师的监督。本研究的目的是调查在医院应用局部万古霉素 TDM 方案是否可以改善 TDM 实践。比较了两家多学科医院的 TDM 结果,一家医院实施并应用了局部 TDM 方案,另一家医院则没有实施和应用局部 TDM 方案。
在拉脱维亚的两家多学科医院进行了回顾性研究。在没有局部 TDM 方案的医院中,收集了 4 年(2016-2020 年)的数据,在有局部 TDM 方案的医院中,收集了 2 年(2018-2020 年)的数据,这是从开发万古霉素 TDM 方案开始的。根据性别、年龄、体重和肾功能对纳入研究的患者数据进行分析。根据剂量方案(万古霉素剂量和给药间隔)、负荷剂量和维持剂量数据、万古霉素浓度以及万古霉素浓度详细信息(采样时间和浓度水平)分析万古霉素治疗。
两所医院在万古霉素给药和浓度采样的起始方面存在差异。与没有 TDM 方案的医院相比,在有 TDM 方案的医院中,发现起始更准确,同时还调整了治疗(97.22% 比 18.95%,p < 0.001),更好地执行负荷剂量给药(22.73% 比 1.29%,p < 0.01),并达到目标浓度(55.56% 比 35.29%,p < 0.01)。在两所医院中,在给予万古霉素前的正确时间框架内进行浓度采样,在统计学上并没有显示出更好的结果(4.60% 比 6.29%,p = 0.786)。
在有 TDM 方案的医院中,万古霉素治疗的适当调整取得了更好的结果。从长远来看,需要可持续的结果和定期的医疗专业人员培训。