Suppr超能文献

万古霉素负荷剂量的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

The clinical efficacy and safety of vancomycin loading dose: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mei Hekun, Wang Jin, Che Haoyue, Wang Rui, Cai Yun

机构信息

Center of Medicine Clinical Research, Department of Pharmacy, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(43):e17639. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017639.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of using vancomycin loading dose remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of vancomycin loading dose in the treatment of infections.

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from their inception up to 5 May 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and other observational studies were included if they provided clinical outcomes or trough concentrations of vancomycin loading dose (20-30 mg/kg) and conventional-dose (10-20 mg/kg) in the treatment of infections. Achievement of therapeutic concentration (serum trough concentrations of vancomycin reached 15-20 mg/L before the second dose), clinical response (clinical improvement or culture-negative), nephrotoxicity (serum creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥50% increasing from the baseline), other adverse events (including pruritus, flushing, rash, and/or red man syndrome), and mortality were analyzed. Heterogeneity was identified using the Cochrane I statistic, and P-value <.10 or I-values >50% indicated significant heterogeneity. Pooled estimates of the intervention effects were determined by the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in Review Manager program, version 5.3.5.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and 7 cohort studies including 2816 infected patients were selected for the analysis, in which serum trough concentrations of vancomycin following the use of vancomycin loading dose or other outcomes were available. Loading dose group had a significantly higher compliance rate of serum trough concentration of 15 to 20 mg/L (OR = 3.06; 95% CI = 1.15-8.15; P = .03) and significantly lower incidence of nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.40-0.87; P = .008; I = 29%) compared with control group. No significant difference was noted between loading dose group and control group in terms of other adverse events and clinical response (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 0.80-4.93; P = .14; I = 0%). The use of vancomycin loading doses in patients can indeed increase the achievement of therapeutic concentration.

CONCLUSION

Vancomycin loading dose increases the achievement of therapeutic concentration without bringing extra risk of nephrotoxicity. However, well-designed large-scale RCTs remain needed to validate the clinical efficacy of vancomycin loading dose and to further evaluate other adverse reactions and mortality.PROSPERO registration number CRD42018093927.

摘要

背景

使用万古霉素负荷剂量的临床意义仍存在争议。进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估万古霉素负荷剂量治疗感染的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索时间从建库至2019年5月5日。纳入随机对照试验(RCT)和其他观察性研究,前提是它们提供了万古霉素负荷剂量(20 - 30mg/kg)和常规剂量(10 - 20mg/kg)治疗感染的临床结局或谷浓度。分析治疗浓度的达成情况(第二次给药前万古霉素血清谷浓度达到15 - 20mg/L)、临床反应(临床改善或培养阴性)、肾毒性(血清肌酐增加≥0.5mg/dL或较基线增加≥50%)、其他不良事件(包括瘙痒、潮红、皮疹和/或红人综合征)以及死亡率。使用Cochrane I统计量识别异质性,P值<0.10或I值>50%表示存在显著异质性。在Review Manager 5.3.5版程序中,通过比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)确定干预效果的合并估计值。

结果

选择了两项RCT和七项队列研究,共2816例感染患者进行分析,这些研究提供了使用万古霉素负荷剂量后的血清谷浓度或其他结局数据。与对照组相比,负荷剂量组血清谷浓度达到15至20mg/L的依从率显著更高(OR = 3.06;95%CI = 1.15 - 8.15;P = 0.03),肾毒性发生率显著更低(OR = 0.59,95%CI = 0.40 - 0.87;P = 0.008;I = 29%)。在其他不良事件和临床反应方面,负荷剂量组与对照组之间未观察到显著差异(OR = 1.98,95%CI = 0.80 - 4.93;P = 0.14;I = 0%)。在患者中使用万古霉素负荷剂量确实可以提高治疗浓度的达成率。

结论

万古霉素负荷剂量可提高治疗浓度的达成率,且不会带来额外的肾毒性风险。然而,仍需要设计良好的大规模RCT来验证万古霉素负荷剂量的临床疗效,并进一步评估其他不良反应和死亡率。PROSPERO注册号CRD42018093927。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9539/6824660/d2041358a31e/medi-98-e17639-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验