Suppr超能文献

辅助阿贝西利联合内分泌治疗高危早期乳腺癌: monarchE 研究的安全性和患者报告结局。

Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy for high-risk early breast cancer: safety and patient-reported outcomes from the monarchE study.

机构信息

University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco.

Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2022 Jun;33(6):616-627. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In monarchE, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) as adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, high-risk, early breast cancer (EBC) demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus ET alone. Detailed safety analyses conducted at a median follow-up of 27 months and key patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment (n = 5591). Safety analyses included incidence, management, and outcomes of common and clinically relevant adverse events (AEs). Patient-reported health-related quality of life, ET symptoms, fatigue, and side-effect burden were assessed.

RESULTS

The addition of abemaciclib to ET resulted in higher incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (49.7% versus 16.3% with ET alone), predominantly laboratory cytopenias [e.g. neutropenia (19.6%)] without clinical complications. Abemaciclib-treated patients experienced more serious AEs (15.2% versus 8.8%). Discontinuation of abemaciclib and/or ET due to AEs occurred in 18.5% of patients, mainly due to grade 1/2 AEs (66.8%). AEs were managed with comedications (e.g. antidiarrheals), abemaciclib dose holds (61.7%), and/or dose reductions (43.4%). Diarrhea was generally low grade (grade 1/2: 76%); grade 2/3 events were highest in the first month (20.5%), most were short-lived (≤7 days) and did not recur. Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) were higher with abemaciclib + ET (2.5%) versus ET (0.6%); in the abemaciclib arm, increased VTE risk was observed with tamoxifen versus aromatase inhibitors (4.3% versus 1.8%). PROs were similar between arms, including being 'bothered by side-effects of treatment', except for diarrhea. At ≥3 months, most patients reporting diarrhea reported 'a little bit' or 'somewhat'.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with high-risk EBC, adjuvant abemaciclib + ET has an acceptable safety profile and tolerability is supported by PRO findings. Most AEs were reversible and manageable with comedications and/or dose modifications, consistent with the known abemaciclib toxicity profile.

摘要

背景

在 monarchE 研究中,与内分泌治疗(ET)单药相比,阿贝西利联合 ET 作为激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子 2 阴性、高危、早期乳腺癌(EBC)的辅助治疗,显著改善了无侵袭性疾病生存。本研究报告了中位随访 27 个月时的详细安全性分析结果和关键患者报告结局(PRO)。

患者和方法

安全性人群包括至少接受过一次研究治疗的所有患者(n=5591)。安全性分析包括常见和临床相关不良事件(AE)的发生率、管理和结局。评估了患者报告的健康相关生活质量、ET 症状、疲劳和副作用负担。

结果

与 ET 单药治疗相比,阿贝西利联合 ET 导致更频繁发生≥3 级 AE(49.7%比 ET 单药组 16.3%),主要是实验室血细胞减少症[如中性粒细胞减少症(19.6%)],无临床并发症。阿贝西利治疗组患者经历了更多的严重 AE(15.2%比 8.8%)。由于 AE,18.5%的患者停用阿贝西利和/或 ET,主要是由于 1/2 级 AE(66.8%)。AE 采用合并用药(如止泻药)、阿贝西利剂量暂停(61.7%)和/或剂量减少(43.4%)进行管理。腹泻通常为低级别(1/2 级:76%);2/3 级事件在第一个月最高(20.5%),大多数持续时间短(≤7 天)且不复发。阿贝西利+ET 组的静脉血栓栓塞事件(VTE)发生率高于 ET 组(2.5%比 0.6%);在阿贝西利组中,与芳香化酶抑制剂相比,他莫昔芬增加了 VTE 风险(4.3%比 1.8%)。与 ET 单药组相比,PRO 结果相似,包括“因治疗副作用而烦恼”,但腹泻除外。在≥3 个月时,大多数报告腹泻的患者报告“有点”或“有些”。

结论

在高危 EBC 患者中,辅助阿贝西利+ET 的安全性可接受,PRO 结果支持其具有良好的耐受性。大多数 AE 是可逆的,可通过合并用药和/或剂量调整来管理,这与已知的阿贝西利毒性特征一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验