University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco.
Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, USA.
Ann Oncol. 2022 Jun;33(6):616-627. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
In monarchE, abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) as adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, high-risk, early breast cancer (EBC) demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival versus ET alone. Detailed safety analyses conducted at a median follow-up of 27 months and key patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are presented.
The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment (n = 5591). Safety analyses included incidence, management, and outcomes of common and clinically relevant adverse events (AEs). Patient-reported health-related quality of life, ET symptoms, fatigue, and side-effect burden were assessed.
The addition of abemaciclib to ET resulted in higher incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (49.7% versus 16.3% with ET alone), predominantly laboratory cytopenias [e.g. neutropenia (19.6%)] without clinical complications. Abemaciclib-treated patients experienced more serious AEs (15.2% versus 8.8%). Discontinuation of abemaciclib and/or ET due to AEs occurred in 18.5% of patients, mainly due to grade 1/2 AEs (66.8%). AEs were managed with comedications (e.g. antidiarrheals), abemaciclib dose holds (61.7%), and/or dose reductions (43.4%). Diarrhea was generally low grade (grade 1/2: 76%); grade 2/3 events were highest in the first month (20.5%), most were short-lived (≤7 days) and did not recur. Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) were higher with abemaciclib + ET (2.5%) versus ET (0.6%); in the abemaciclib arm, increased VTE risk was observed with tamoxifen versus aromatase inhibitors (4.3% versus 1.8%). PROs were similar between arms, including being 'bothered by side-effects of treatment', except for diarrhea. At ≥3 months, most patients reporting diarrhea reported 'a little bit' or 'somewhat'.
In patients with high-risk EBC, adjuvant abemaciclib + ET has an acceptable safety profile and tolerability is supported by PRO findings. Most AEs were reversible and manageable with comedications and/or dose modifications, consistent with the known abemaciclib toxicity profile.
在 monarchE 研究中,与内分泌治疗(ET)单药相比,阿贝西利联合 ET 作为激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子 2 阴性、高危、早期乳腺癌(EBC)的辅助治疗,显著改善了无侵袭性疾病生存。本研究报告了中位随访 27 个月时的详细安全性分析结果和关键患者报告结局(PRO)。
安全性人群包括至少接受过一次研究治疗的所有患者(n=5591)。安全性分析包括常见和临床相关不良事件(AE)的发生率、管理和结局。评估了患者报告的健康相关生活质量、ET 症状、疲劳和副作用负担。
与 ET 单药治疗相比,阿贝西利联合 ET 导致更频繁发生≥3 级 AE(49.7%比 ET 单药组 16.3%),主要是实验室血细胞减少症[如中性粒细胞减少症(19.6%)],无临床并发症。阿贝西利治疗组患者经历了更多的严重 AE(15.2%比 8.8%)。由于 AE,18.5%的患者停用阿贝西利和/或 ET,主要是由于 1/2 级 AE(66.8%)。AE 采用合并用药(如止泻药)、阿贝西利剂量暂停(61.7%)和/或剂量减少(43.4%)进行管理。腹泻通常为低级别(1/2 级:76%);2/3 级事件在第一个月最高(20.5%),大多数持续时间短(≤7 天)且不复发。阿贝西利+ET 组的静脉血栓栓塞事件(VTE)发生率高于 ET 组(2.5%比 0.6%);在阿贝西利组中,与芳香化酶抑制剂相比,他莫昔芬增加了 VTE 风险(4.3%比 1.8%)。与 ET 单药组相比,PRO 结果相似,包括“因治疗副作用而烦恼”,但腹泻除外。在≥3 个月时,大多数报告腹泻的患者报告“有点”或“有些”。
在高危 EBC 患者中,辅助阿贝西利+ET 的安全性可接受,PRO 结果支持其具有良好的耐受性。大多数 AE 是可逆的,可通过合并用药和/或剂量调整来管理,这与已知的阿贝西利毒性特征一致。